ArticleCancer management and research2023
Construction of a Prognostic Model Based on Methylation-Related Genes in Patients with Colon Adenocarcinoma.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) is the second leading cause of death in the world, and the new incidence rate ranks third among all cancers. Abnormal DNA methylation is related to the occurrence and development of tumors. In this study, we aimed to identify genes associated with abnormal methylation in COAD. Methods: COAD transcriptome data, methylation data and clinical information were downloaded from the TCGA database and GEO database. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and methylated genes (DMGs) were analyzed and identified in COAD. PCA analysis was applied to divide COAD into subtypes, and the survival and immune cell infiltration of each subtype were evaluated. Cox and LASSO analyses were performed to construct COAD risk model. GSEA was used to evaluate the enrichment pathways. The Kaplan-Meier was used to analyze the difference in survival. ROC curve was plotted to evaluate the accuracy of the model, and GSE17536 was used to verify the accuracy of the risk model. The risk model is combined with the clinicopathological characteristics of COAD patients to perform multivariate Cox regression analysis to obtain independent risk factors and draw nomograms. Results: In total, 4564 DEGs and 1093 DMGs were screened, among which 298 were found to be overlapping genes. For 220 of these overlapping genes, the methylation was significantly negatively correlated to expression levels. An optimal signature from 4 methylated biomarkers was identified to construct the prognostic model. Conclusion: Our study identified 4 methylated biomarkers in the COAD. Then, we constructed the risk model to provide a theoretical basis and reference value for the research and treatment of COAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.