Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37821509›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Larvicidal potential, toxicological assessment, and molecular docking studies of four Egyptian bacterial strains against Culex pipiens L. (Diptera: Culicidae).

Tokaa Mansour, Wafaa H Radwan, Menna Mansour, Mohamed Gomaa, Farouk Farouk, Mohamed Shepl, Ahmed G Soliman, Basma T Abd-Elhalim, Mohamed M K El-Senosy, Ashraf Bakry and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tokaa MansourUndergraduate student, Biotechnology Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 12411, Egypt.
Wafaa H RadwanDepartment of Agriculture Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 12411, Egypt.
Menna MansourUndergraduate student, Biotechnology Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 12411, Egypt.
Mohamed GomaaUndergraduate student, Biotechnology Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 12411, Egypt.
Farouk FaroukUndergraduate student, Biotechnology Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 12411, Egypt.
Mohamed SheplUndergraduate student, Biotechnology Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 12411, Egypt.
Ahmed G SolimanUndergraduate student, Biotechnology Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 12411, Egypt.
Basma T Abd-ElhalimDepartment of Agriculture Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 12411, Egypt.
Mohamed M K El-SenosyDepartment of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 12411, Egypt.
Ashraf BakryDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 12411, Egypt.
Naglaa M EbeedDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 12411, Egypt.
Neima K AlsenosyDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 12411, Egypt.
Hesham ElhariryDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 12411, Egypt.
Ahmed GalalDepartment of Poultry Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 12411, Egypt.
Salwa M El-SayedDepartment of Agricultural Biochemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 12411, Egypt.
Eslam AdlyDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 15611, Egypt. eslam.saad5@gmail.com.
Samah H Abu-HussienDepartment of Agriculture Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 12411, Egypt. samah_hashem1@agr.asu.edu.eg.
Ain Shams University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mosquito control in Egypt depends on applying chemical synthetic pesticides that impact negatively on human health and the environment as well as the development of antibiotic and chemical resistance. This study aims to control the 3rd and 4th instars of Culex pipiens larvae using four bacterial strains. According to Phenotypic and molecular identification, the four isolates were identified as Bacillus subtilis MICUL D2023, Serratia marcescens MICUL A2023, Streptomyces albus LARVICID, and Pseudomonas fluorescens MICUL B2023. All strains were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers OQ764791, OQ729954, OQ726575, and OQ891356, respectively. Larvicidal activity of all microbial strain metabolites against a field strain of C. pipiens explored low LC

Indexed as

CulexCulicidaeInsecticidesPesticidesAcetylcholineAnimalsEgyptEsterasesHumansLarvaMolecular Docking SimulationSerratia marcescensAcetylcholineEsterasesInsecticidesPesticides

Identifiers

PMID37821509
PMCPMC10567778
OpenAlexW4387540914

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.