Article in Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Shenghui XiaoNational Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement, Shandong Engineering Research Center of Plant-Microbial Restoration for Saline-Alkali Land, College of Life Sciences Shandong Agricultural University Tai'an Shandong province China.
Yiman WanNational Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement, Shandong Engineering Research Center of Plant-Microbial Restoration for Saline-Alkali Land, College of Life Sciences Shandong Agricultural University Tai'an Shandong province China.
Yue ZhengNational Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement, Shandong Engineering Research Center of Plant-Microbial Restoration for Saline-Alkali Land, College of Life Sciences Shandong Agricultural University Tai'an Shandong province China.
Yongdong WangNational Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement, Shandong Engineering Research Center of Plant-Microbial Restoration for Saline-Alkali Land, College of Life Sciences Shandong Agricultural University Tai'an Shandong province China.
Jiayin FanNational Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement, Shandong Engineering Research Center of Plant-Microbial Restoration for Saline-Alkali Land, College of Life Sciences Shandong Agricultural University Tai'an Shandong province China.
Qian XuNational Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement, Shandong Engineering Research Center of Plant-Microbial Restoration for Saline-Alkali Land, College of Life Sciences Shandong Agricultural University Tai'an Shandong province China.
Zheng GaoNational Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement, Shandong Engineering Research Center of Plant-Microbial Restoration for Saline-Alkali Land, College of Life Sciences Shandong Agricultural University Tai'an Shandong province China.
Changai WuNational Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement, Shandong Engineering Research Center of Plant-Microbial Restoration for Saline-Alkali Land, College of Life Sciences Shandong Agricultural University Tai'an Shandong province China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4053-8262
Shandong Agricultural University · CN
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Plant growth-promoting bacterias (PGPBs) can increase crop output under normal and abiotic conditions. However, the mechanisms underlying the plant salt tolerance-promoting role of PGPBs still remain largely unknown. In this study, we demonstrated that
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.