Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37828440›Full record

SynthesisGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2023

Sequence-based GWAS meta-analyses for beef production traits.

Marie-Pierre Sanchez, Thierry Tribout, Naveen K Kadri, Praveen K Chitneedi, Steffen Maak, Chris Hozé, Mekki Boussaha, Pascal Croiseau, Romain Philippe, Mirjam Spengeler and 6 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of Mutations in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Identification ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Transforming beef quality through healthy breeding: a strategy to reduce carcinogenic compounds and enhance human health: a review.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Marie-Pierre SanchezUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France. marie-pierre.sanchez@inrae.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1371-5342
Thierry TriboutUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Naveen K KadriAnimal Genomics, ETH Zurich, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
Praveen K ChitneediResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), 18196, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Steffen MaakResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), 18196, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Chris HozéUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Mekki BoussahaUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Pascal CroiseauUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Romain PhilippeINRAE, USC1061 GAMAA, Université de Limoges, 87060, Limoges, France.
Mirjam SpengelerQualitasAG, 6300, Zug, Switzerland.
Christa KühnResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), 18196, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Yining WangLacombe Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB, T4L 1W1, Canada.
Changxi LiLacombe Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB, T4L 1W1, Canada.
Graham PlastowDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Livestock Gentec, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2HI, Canada.
Hubert PauschAnimal Genomics, ETH Zurich, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
Didier BoichardUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
AgroParisTech · FRAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CAETH Zurich · CHResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN) · DEFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

H2020 Food BovReg 815668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombining the results of within-population genome-wide association studies (GWAS) based on whole-genome sequences into a single meta-analysis (MA) is an accurate and powerful method for identifying variants associated with complex traits. As part of the H2020 BovReg project, we performed sequence-level MA for beef production traits. Five partners from France, Switzerland, Germany, and Canada contributed summary statistics from sequence-based GWAS conducted with 54,782 animals from 15 purebred or crossbred populations. We combined the summary statistics for four growth, nine morphology, and 15 carcass traits into 16 MA, using both fixed effects and z-score methods.

resultsThe fixed-effects method was generally more informative to provide indication on potentially causal variants, although we combined substantially different traits in each MA. In comparison with within-population GWAS, this approach highlighted (i) a larger number of quantitative trait loci (QTL), (ii) QTL more frequently located in genomic regions known for their effects on growth and meat/carcass traits, (iii) a smaller number of genomic variants within the QTL, and (iv) candidate variants that were more frequently located in genes. MA pinpointed variants in genes, including MSTN, LCORL, and PLAG1 that have been previously associated with morphology and carcass traits. We also identified dozens of other variants located in genes associated with growth and carcass traits, or with a function that may be related to meat production (e.g., HS6ST1, HERC2, WDR75, COL3A1, SLIT2, MED28, and ANKAR). Some of these variants overlapped with expression or splicing QTL reported in the cattle Genotype-Tissue Expression atlas (CattleGTEx) and could therefore regulate gene expression.

conclusionsBy identifying candidate genes and potential causal variants associated with beef production traits in cattle, MA demonstrates great potential for investigating the biological mechanisms underlying these traits. As a complement to within-population GWAS, this approach can provide deeper insights into the genetic architecture of complex traits in beef cattle.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyQuantitative Trait LociAnimalsCattleGenomicsMeatPhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID37828440
PMCPMC10568825
OpenAlexW4387577269

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.