SynthesisCurrent medicinal chemistry2025
Neopterin as a Potential Biomarker for the Early Diagnosis of Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Current medicinal chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeopterin (NEO) is an inflammatory biomarker with proposed diagnostic value in cardiovascular diseases. Some correlations have been discovered between NEO levels and the incidence, severity, and adverse outcomes of heart failure (HF). However, there are discrepancies in the results reported in the literature.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing urinary and blood NEO concentrations between individuals with HF, cardiac insufficiency, or dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) with control groups or those monitoring the role of NEO concentrations as a predictive marker of adverse outcomes in HF patients.
resultsA total of 24 studies that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The studies demonstrated the alteration of NEO in blood or urine samples in subjects with HF, cardiac insufficiency, or DCM compared with control groups. Also, reviewing the studies suggested a link between reduced ejection fraction, higher NYHA classes, and a higher risk of adverse cardiac outcomes with increased NEO levels. The meta-analysis of three studies revealed a significant increase in serum NEO levels in HF cases compared to that in healthy controls with an effect size of 3.72 (95 % CI 0.16 to 7.28; p = 0.04).
conclusionMeta-analysis demonstrated a significant difference between serum NEO levels of HF cases and healthy subjects. This evidence implies the potential of serum NEO as a valuable diagnostic biomarker in HF patients. Also, the review of the studies revealed the prognostic potential of NEO. Further research is required to assess the usefulness of NEO as a diagnostic/prognostic biomarker for HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.