Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37833697›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2023

Prognostic significance of the stress hyperglycemia ratio in critically ill patients.

Le Li, Minghao Zhao, Zhuxin Zhang, Likun Zhou, Zhenhao Zhang, Yulong Xiong, Zhao Hu, Yan Yao

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 74 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Le Li *Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, 100037, China.
Minghao Zhao *Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, 100037, China.
Zhuxin ZhangChinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, 100037, China.
Likun ZhouChinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, 100037, China.
Zhenhao ZhangChinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, 100037, China.
Yulong XiongChinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, 100037, China.
Zhao HuChinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, 100037, China.
Yan YaoChinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, 100037, China. ianyao@263.net.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) has demonstrated a noteworthy association with unfavorable cardiovascular clinical outcomes and heightened in-hospital mortality. Nonetheless, this relationship in critically ill patients remains uncertain. This study aims to elucidate the correlation between SHR and patient prognosis within the critical care setting.

methodsA total of 8978 patients admitted in intensive care unit (ICU) were included in this study. We categorized SHR into uniform groups and assessed its relationship with mortality using logistic or Cox regression analysis. Additionally, we employed the restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis method to further evaluate the correlation between SHR as a continuous variable and mortality. The outcomes of interest in this study were in-hospital and 1-year all-cause mortality.

resultsIn this investigation, a total of 825 (9.2%) patients experienced in-hospital mortality, while 3,130 (34.9%) individuals died within the 1-year follow-up period. After adjusting for confounding variables, we identified a U-shaped correlation between SHR and both in-hospital and 1-year mortality. Specifically, within the SHR range of 0.75-0.99, the incidence of adverse events was minimized. For each 0.25 increase in the SHR level within this range, the risk of in-hospital mortality rose by 1.34-fold (odds ratio [OR]: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.25-1.44), while a 0.25 decrease in SHR within 0.75-0.99 range increased risk by 1.38-fold (OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.10-1.75).

conclusionThere was a U-shaped association between SHR and short- and long-term mortality in critical ill patients, and the inflection point of SHR for poor prognosis was identified at an SHR value of 0.96.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessHyperglycemiaCritical CareHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesCritical illOutcomesRestricted cubic splineStress hyperglycemia ratio

Identifiers

PMID37833697
PMCPMC10576399

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.