Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37833938›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Amyloid-β Effects on Peripheral Nerve: A New Model System.

Mark M Stecker, Ankita Srivastava, Allison B Reiss

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark M SteckerFresno Institute of Neuroscience, Fresno, CA 93730, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9632-168X
Ankita SrivastavaDepartment of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Long Island, NY 11501, USA.
Allison B ReissDepartment of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Long Island, NY 11501, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4478-2441
Long Island University · USCalifornia State University, Fresno · US

Funding

Alzheimer's Foundation of America AWD0004772The Herb and Evelyn Abrams Family Amyloid Research Fund na
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although there are many biochemical methods to measure amyloid-β (Aβ)42 concentration, one of the critical issues in the study of the effects of Aβ42 on the nervous system is a simple physiological measurement. The in vitro rat sciatic nerve model is employed and the nerve action potential (NAP) is quantified with different stimuli while exposed to different concentrations of Aβ42. Aβ42 predominantly reduces the NAP amplitude with minimal effects on other parameters except at low stimulus currents and short inter-stimulus intervals. The effects of Aβ42 are significantly concentration-dependent, with a maximum reduction in NAP amplitude at a concentration of 70 nM and smaller effects on the NAP amplitude at higher and lower concentrations. However, even physiologic concentrations in the range of 70 pM did reduce the NAP amplitude. The effects of Aβ42 became maximal 5-8 h after exposure and did not reverse during a 30 min washout period. The in vitro rat sciatic nerve model is sensitive to the effects of physiologic concentrations of Aβ42. These experiments suggest that the effect of Aβ42 is a very complex function of concentration that may be the result of amyloid-related changes in membrane properties or sodium channels.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsModels, BiologicalPeptide FragmentsRatsSciatic NerveAmyloid beta-PeptidesPeptide Fragmentsaction potentialamyloid β-peptideaxonneuronperipheral nerve stimulationsciatic nerve

Identifiers

PMID37833938
PMCPMC10572603
OpenAlexW4386996568

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.