Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37834803›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Telemedicine in Elderly Hypertensive and Patients with Chronic Diseases during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Miguel Quesada-Caballero, Ana Carmona-García, Sara Chami-Peña, Antonio M Caballero-Mateos, Oscar Fernández-Martín, Guillermo A Cañadas-De la Fuente, José Luis Romero-Bejar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Miguel Quesada-CaballeroCentro de Salud Albayda La Cruz, Distrito Sanitario Granada-Metropolitano, Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Calle Virgen de la Consolación 12, 18015 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5299-0710
Ana Carmona-GarcíaCritical Care and Emergency Unit (UCCU), Distrito Sanitario Granada-Metropolitano, Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Calle Virgen de la Consolación 12, 18015 Granada, Spain.
Sara Chami-PeñaHospital de la Serranía de Ronda, Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Carretera San Pedro Km 2, 29400 Ronda, Spain.
Antonio M Caballero-MateosGastroenterology and Hepatology Department, San Cecilio University Hospital, Av. del Conocimiento s/n, 18016 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3425-7758
Oscar Fernández-MartínCentro de Salud Guadix, Área de Gestión Sanitaria Nordeste Granada, Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Ctra. de Murcia s/n, 18800 Baza, Spain.
Guillermo A Cañadas-De la FuenteFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Avda. Ilustración 60, 18016 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3012-3410
José Luis Romero-BejarStatistics and Operational Research Department, University of Granada, Avda. Fuentenueva s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5310-9638
Andalusian Health Service · ESUniversidad de Granada · ESInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne aspect of the distancing measures imposed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic is that telemedicine consultations have increased exponentially. Among these consultations, the assessment and follow-up of patients with chronic diseases in a non-presential setting has been strengthened considerably. Nevertheless, some controversy remains about the most suitable means of patient follow-up.

objectiveTo analyze the impact of the telemedicine measures implemented during the COVID-19 period on chronic patients. MATERIAL AND

methodsA systematic review was carried out using the following databases: PubMed, Pro-Quest, and Scopus. The systematic review followed the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The search equation utilized descriptors sourced from the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) thesaurus. The search equation was: "hypertension AND older AND primary care AND (COVID-19 OR coronavirus)" and its Spanish equivalent.

resultsThe following data were obtained: 14 articles provided data on 6,109,628 patients and another 4 articles focused on a study population of 9684 physicians. Telemedicine was less likely to be used by elderly patients (OR 0.85; 95% C.I. 0.83-0.88;

conclusionsTelemedicine is of proven value and has been especially useful in the COVID-19 pandemic. A mixed remote-presential model is most efficient. Appropriate training in this area for physicians and patients, together with correct provision, is essential to prevent errors in implementation and use.

Indexed as

chronic diseaseshypertensionoldertelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID37834803
PMCPMC10574013
OpenAlexW4386995666

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.