ArticleCancers2023
RNA-Seq-Based Molecular Classification Analyses in Colorectal Cancer and Synchronous Adenoma.
Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Omics-enhanced nanomedicine: integrating multi-omics for precision cancer diagnosis and therapy.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Comprehensive analysis of transcriptome and microbiome in colorectal cancer with synchronous polyp patients.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal cancers (CRC) are classified into consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) based on gene expression profiles. The revised classification system iCMS was proposed by considering intrinsic epithelial status, microsatellite instability (MSI), and fibrosis. This study aimed to provide molecular evidence for the adenoma-carcinoma sequence concept by examining CRC and synchronous adenomas using iCMS. Epithelial CMS cell proportion was estimated using CiberSortx, an in silico cell fractionation method that included CMS cell types among the reference cell types. A random forest (RF) model estimated the posterior probabilities of CMS classes, which were compared with the CiberSortx results. Gene expression profiles of the published iCMS signature panel were retrieved from our dataset and subjected to heatmap clustering for classification. Bulk RNA sequencing data were collected from 29 adenocarcinomas and 11 adenoma samples. CiberSortx showed all CRC contained either CMS2 or CMS3 as the major epithelial cancer cell type. The RF model classified approximately half of the CRC as CMS4, whereas CMS4 was hardly detected by CiberSortx. Because they were enriched with myofibroblasts as per the CiberSortx classification, we tentatively designated them as iCMS2-F/iCMS3-F. iCMS coupled with the application of an in silico cell fractionation method can provide the molecular dissection of CRC and adenoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.