Evidence mapPaperPMID 37836508Full record

SynthesisNutrients2023

Myoinositols Prevent Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Related Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Dorina Greff, Szilárd Váncsa, Alex Váradi, Julia Szinte, Sunjune Park, Péter Hegyi, Péter Nyirády, Nándor Ács, Eszter Mária Horváth, Szabolcs Várbíró

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of inositol supplementation for the prevention and treatment of gestational diabetes in pregnant women: Results from an umbrella meta-analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dorina GreffCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Szilárd VáncsaCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-9347-8163
Alex VáradiInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7621 Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-8229-6340
Julia SzinteCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Sunjune ParkCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Péter HegyiCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Péter NyirádyCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Nándor ÁcsCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Eszter Mária HorváthDepartment of Physiology, Semmelweis University, Tűzoltó Str. 37-47, 1094 Budapest, Hungary.
Szabolcs VárbíróDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, 1083 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-7109-6906
Semmelweis University · HUUniversity of Debrecen · HU

Funding

Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office NFKIH-FK 129206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has several short- and long-term adverse effects on the mother and the offspring, no medicine is generally prescribed to prevent GDM. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect of inositol supplementation in preventing GDM and related outcomes. Systematic search was performed in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase until 13 September 2023. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared the efficacy of inositols to placebo in pregnant women at high risk for GDM. Our primary outcome was the incidence of GDM, whereas secondary outcomes were oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and maternal and fetal complications. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021284939). Eight eligible RCTs were identified, including the data of 1795 patients. The incidence of GDM was halved by inositols compared to placebo (RR = 0.42, CI: 0.26-0.67). Fasting, 1-h, and 2-h OGTT glucose levels were significantly decreased by inositols. The stereoisomer myoinositol also reduced the risk of insulin need (RR = 0.29, CI: 0.13-0.68), preeclampsia or gestational hypertension (RR = 0.38, CI: 0.2-0.71), preterm birth (RR = 0.44, CI: 0.22-0.88), and neonatal hypoglycemia (RR = 0.12, CI: 0.03-0.55). Myoinositol decrease the incidence of GDM in pregnancies high-risk for GDM. Moreover, myoinositol supplementation reduces the risk of insulin need, preeclampsia or gestational hypertension, preterm birth, and neonatal hypoglycemia. Based on the present study 2-4 g myoinositol canbe suggested from the first trimester to prevent GDM and related outcomes.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedHypoglycemiaPre-EclampsiaPremature BirthFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInositolInsulinPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicInositolInsulinGDMgestational hypertensioninositolmaternal healthneonatalpreeclampsiapreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID37836508
PMCPMC10574514
OpenAlexW4387259255

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.