Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37836679›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Aroma Difference Analysis of Partridge Tea (

Xinxin Gui, Xueping Feng, Minqiang Tang, Juanling Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xinxin GuiHainan Key Laboratory of Biology of Tropical Flowers and Trees Resources, Forestry Institute, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China.
Xueping FengHainan Key Laboratory of Biology of Tropical Flowers and Trees Resources, Forestry Institute, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China.
Minqiang TangHainan Key Laboratory of Biology of Tropical Flowers and Trees Resources, Forestry Institute, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8590-1814
Juanling LiHainan Key Laboratory of Biology of Tropical Flowers and Trees Resources, Forestry Institute, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China.

Funding

Key Research and Development Program of Hainan Province ZDYF2020104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Partridge tea has high medicinal value due to its rich content of terpenoids, phenols, flavonoids, and other related bioactive components. In order to study the best drying method for partridge tea, four treatments, including outdoor sun drying (OD), indoor shade drying (ID), hot-air drying (HAD), and low-temperature freeze-drying (LTD), were performed. The results showed that the OD and HAD treatments favored the retention of the red color of their products, while the ID and LTD treatments were more favorable for the retention of the green color. The HS-SPME-GC-MS results showed that a total of 82 compounds were identified in the four drying treatments of partridge tea, and the most abundant compounds were terpenoids (88.34-89.92%). The HAD-treated tea had the highest terpenoid content (89.92%) and high levels of flavor compounds typical of partridge tea (52.28%). OPLS-DA and PCA showed that α-copaene, β-bourbonene, caryophyllene, α-guaiene, and δ-cadinene could be considered candidate marker compounds for judging the aroma quality of partridge tea with different drying treatments. This study will not only provide a basis for processing and flavor quality control but also for spice and seasoning product development in partridge tea.

Indexed as

Mallotus PlantVolatile Organic CompoundsGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryMeatOdorantsSolid Phase MicroextractionTeaTerpenesTeaTerpenesVolatile Organic Compoundsdrying methodGC-MSvolatile compounds

Identifiers

PMID37836679
PMCPMC10574705

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.