Evidence mapPaperPMID 37838000Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2024

Natural Language Processing Applied to Clinical Documentation in Post-acute Care Settings: A Scoping Review.

Danielle Scharp, Mollie Hobensack, Anahita Davoudi, Maxim Topaz

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. From Conversation to Standardized Terminology: An LLM-RAG Approach for Automated Health Problem Identification in Home Healthcare.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Applying natural language processing to understand symptoms among older adult home healthcare patients with urinary incontinence.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danielle ScharpColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: dks2147@cumc.columbia.edu.
Mollie HobensackColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.
Anahita DavoudiVNS Health, Center for Home Care Policy & Research, New York, NY, USA.
Maxim TopazColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Reducing Health Disparities Through InformaticsT32NR007969 · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · 2002 to 2025
$1.2M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS027742NINR NIH HHS P30 NR016587NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the scope of the application of natural language processing to free-text clinical notes in post-acute care and provide a foundation for future natural language processing-based research in these settings.

designScoping review; reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. SETTING AND

participantsPost-acute care (ie, home health care, long-term care, skilled nursing facilities, and inpatient rehabilitation facilities).

methodsPubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Embase were searched in February 2023. Eligible studies had quantitative designs that used natural language processing applied to clinical documentation in post-acute care settings. The quality of each study was appraised.

resultsTwenty-one studies were included. Almost all studies were conducted in home health care settings. Most studies extracted data from electronic health records to examine the risk for negative outcomes, including acute care utilization, medication errors, and suicide mortality. About half of the studies did not report age, sex, race, or ethnicity data or use standardized terminologies. Only 8 studies included variables from socio-behavioral domains. Most studies fulfilled all quality appraisal indicators. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The application of natural language processing is nascent in post-acute care settings. Future research should apply natural language processing using standardized terminologies to leverage free-text clinical notes in post-acute care to promote timely, comprehensive, and equitable care. Natural language processing could be integrated with predictive models to help identify patients who are at risk of negative outcomes. Future research should incorporate socio-behavioral determinants and diverse samples to improve health equity in informatics tools.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingSubacute CareDocumentationHumansHome health carelong-term carenatural language processingnursing informaticspost-acute carescoping review

Identifiers

PMID37838000
PMCPMC10792659

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.