ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2023
Defining human-AI teaming the human-centered way: a scoping review and network analysis.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring College Students' AI Dependence in Human-AI Collaborative Creation: Development and Validation of the CC-PACE Model.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- Patient and clinician engagement with generative artificial intelligence (GenAI): A scoping review of implications for patient-centered communication.Patient education and counseling · 2026Article
- Flight rules for clinical AI: lessons from aviation for human-AI collaboration in medicine.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- From AI adaptation to innovation: how leader AI crafting shapes employee innovative behavior.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- AGI imagined: social AGI and the co-formation of human-AGI society.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- The influence of perceived AI capability on learning engagement in smart education environments: the mediating role of academic self-efficacy and the moderating role of teacher-student relationship.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Linking traditional and technological activities of daily living: Building modern, adaptable measures of daily functioning.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2025Article
- AI, digital twins, and healthcare utilization behaviour: evidence from a Swiss population survey.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Cyber-Creativity: A Decalogue of Research Challenges.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- Toward a human-centric co-design methodology for AI detection of differences between planned and delivered dose in radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Towards fluid human-agent collaboration: From dynamic collaboration patterns to models of theory of mind reasoning.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Article
- Healthcare Professionals' perspectives on AI-driven decision support in young adult mental health: an analysis through the lens of a shared decision-making framework.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- A Machine Learning Approach with Human-AI Collaboration for Automated Classification of Patient Safety Event Reports: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Revisiting the role of HR in the age of AI: bringing humans and machines closer together in the workplace.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023Review
- Medical Education: Considerations for a Successful Integration of Learning with and Learning about AI.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
- AI is Here to Stay: A Scenario-Based Exploration of Leadership, Followership, and the Impact on Skill Development.New directions for student leadershipArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: With the advancement of technology and the increasing utilization of AI, the nature of human work is evolving, requiring individuals to collaborate not only with other humans but also with AI technologies to accomplish complex goals. This requires a shift in perspective from technology-driven questions to a human-centered research and design agenda putting people and evolving teams in the center of attention. A socio-technical approach is needed to view AI as more than just a technological tool, but as a team member, leading to the emergence of human-AI teaming (HAIT). In this new form of work, humans and AI synergistically combine their respective capabilities to accomplish shared goals. Methods: The aim of our work is to uncover current research streams on HAIT and derive a unified understanding of the construct through a bibliometric network analysis, a scoping review and synthetization of a definition from a socio-technical point of view. In addition, antecedents and outcomes examined in the literature are extracted to guide future research in this field. Results: Through network analysis, five clusters with different research focuses on HAIT were identified. These clusters revolve around (1) human and (2) task-dependent variables, (3) AI explainability, (4) AI-driven robotic systems, and (5) the effects of AI performance on human perception. Despite these diverse research focuses, the current body of literature is predominantly driven by a technology-centric and engineering perspective, with no consistent definition or terminology of HAIT emerging to date. Discussion: We propose a unifying definition combining a human-centered and team-oriented perspective as well as summarize what is still needed in future research regarding HAIT. Thus, this work contributes to support the idea of the Frontiers Research Topic of a theoretical and conceptual basis for human work with AI systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.