Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37841632›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2023

Form and contour: breeding and genetics of organ shape from wild relatives to modern vegetable crops.

Irwin L Goldman, Yanbing Wang, Andrey Vega Alfaro, Scott Brainard, Madeline W Oravec, Cecilia Elizabeth McGregor, Esther van der Knaap

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Horticulture research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Irwin L GoldmanDepartment of Plant and Agroecosystem Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Yanbing WangCenter for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Andrey Vega AlfaroDepartment of Plant and Agroecosystem Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Scott BrainardDepartment of Plant and Agroecosystem Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Madeline W OravecDepartment of Plant and Agroecosystem Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Cecilia Elizabeth McGregorDepartment of Horticulture, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Esther van der KnaapCenter for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Georgia · USApplied Genetic Technologies (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shape is a primary determinant of consumer preference for many horticultural crops and it is also associated with many aspects of marketing, harvest mechanics, and postharvest handling. Perceptions of quality and preference often map to specific shapes of fruits, tubers, leaves, flowers, roots, and other plant organs. As a result, humans have greatly expanded the palette of shapes available for horticultural crops, in many cases creating a series of market classes where particular shapes predominate. Crop wild relatives possess organs shaped by natural selection, while domesticated species possess organs shaped by human desires. Selection for visually-pleasing shapes in vegetable crops resulted from a number of opportunistic factors, including modification of supernumerary cambia, allelic variation at loci that control fundamental processes such as cell division, cell elongation, transposon-mediated variation, and partitioning of photosynthate. Genes that control cell division patterning may be universal shape regulators in horticultural crops, influencing the form of fruits, tubers, and grains in disparate species. Crop wild relatives are often considered less relevant for modern breeding efforts when it comes to characteristics such as shape, however this view may be unnecessarily limiting. Useful allelic variation in wild species may not have been examined or exploited with respect to shape modifications, and newly emergent information on key genes and proteins may provide additional opportunities to regulate the form and contour of vegetable crops.

Indexed as

digital imagingfruit shapeIQD/SUNsmarket classOVATE Family Proteinsroot shapeTONNEAU1 Recruiting Motif (TRM) familyuniversal shape regulators

Identifiers

PMID37841632
PMCPMC10568141
OpenAlexW4387130410

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.