Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37845345›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A supervised learning regression method for the analysis of oral sensitivity of healthy individuals and patients with chemosensory loss.

Lala Chaimae Naciri, Mariano Mastinu, Melania Melis, Tomer Green, Anne Wolf, Thomas Hummel, Iole Tomassini Barbarossa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Lala Chaimae NaciriDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, CA, Italy.
Mariano MastinuDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, CA, Italy.
Melania MelisDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, CA, Italy.
Tomer GreenInstitute of Biochemistry, Food Science and Nutrition, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.
Anne WolfSmell & Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Thomas HummelSmell & Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany. thomas.hummel@tu-dresden.de.
Iole Tomassini BarbarossaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, CA, Italy. tomassin@unica.it.
TU Dresden · DEUniversity of Cagliari · ITHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gustatory, olfactory, and trigeminal systems are anatomically separated. However, they interact cognitively to give rise to oral perception, which can significantly affect health and quality of life. We built a Supervised Learning (SL) regression model that, exploiting participants' features, was capable of automatically analyzing with high precision the self-ratings of oral sensitivity of healthy participants and patients with chemosensory loss, determining the contribution of its components: gustatory, olfactory, and trigeminal. CatBoost regressor provided predicted values of the self-rated oral sensitivity close to experimental values. Patients showed lower predicted values of oral sensitivity, lower scores for measured taste, spiciness, astringency, and smell sensitivity, higher BMI, and lower levels of well-being. CatBoost regressor defined the impact of the single components of oral perception in the two groups. The trigeminal component was the most significant, though astringency and spiciness provided similar contributions in controls, while astringency was most important in patients. Taste was more important in controls while smell was the least important in both groups. Identifying the significance of the oral perception components and the differences between the two groups provide important information to allow for more targeted examinations supporting both patients and healthcare professionals in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Olfaction DisordersTasteHumansQuality of LifeSmellSupervised Machine LearningTaste Perception

Identifiers

PMID37845345
PMCPMC10579260
OpenAlexW4387666828

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.