Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37847553›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Determining the Impact of Opioid Policy on Substance Use and Mental Health-Related Harms: Protocol for a Data Linkage Study.

Ting Xia, Louisa Picco, Samanta Lalic, Rachelle Buchbinder, J Simon Bell, Nadine E Andrew, Dan I Lubman, Christopher Pearce, Suzanne Nielsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ting XiaMonash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5033-6248
Louisa PiccoMonash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7593-3209
Samanta LalicCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7055-3626
Rachelle BuchbinderMusculoskeletal Health and Wiser Health Care Units, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, St Kilda, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0597-0933
J Simon BellCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6115-2767
Nadine E AndrewPeninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Peninsula Health, Monash University, Frankston, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4846-2840
Dan I LubmanTurning Point, Eastern Health, Richmond, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6747-1937
Christopher PearceOutcome Health, Surrey Hills, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3132-6033
Suzanne NielsenMonash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5341-1055
Eastern Health · AUMonash University · AUMonash Health · AUPeninsula Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing harms related to prescription opioids over the past decade have led to the introduction of a range of key national and state policy initiatives across Australia. These include introducing a mandatory real-time prescription drug-monitoring program in the state of Victoria from April 2020 and a series of changes to subsidies for opioids on the Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme from June 2020. Together, these changes aim to influence opioid supply and reduce harms related to prescription opioids, yet few studies have specifically explored how these policies have influenced opioid prescribing and related harms in Australia.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to examine the impact of a range of opioid-related policies on hospital admissions and emergency department (ED) presentations in Victoria, Australia. In particular, the study aims to understand the effect of various opioid policies and opioid-prescribing changes on (1) the number and rates of ED presentations and hospital admissions attributed to substance use (ie, opioid and nonopioid related) or mental ill-health (eg, suicide, self-harm, anxiety, and depression), (2) the association between differing opioid dose trajectories and the likelihood of ED presentations and hospital admissions related to substance use and mental ill-health, and (3) whether changes in an individual's opioid prescribing change the risk related to ED presentations and hospital admissions related to substance use and mental ill-health.

methodsWe will conduct a population-level linked data study. General practice health records obtained from the Population Level Analysis and Reporting platform are linked with person-level data from 3 large hospital networks in Victoria, Australia. Interrupted time series analysis will be used to examine the impact of opioid policies on a range of harms, including the rates of presentations related to substance use (opioid and nonopioid) and mental ill-health among the primary care cohort. Group-based trajectory modeling and a case-crossover design will be used to further explore the impact of changes in opioid dosage and other covariates on opioid and nonopioid poisonings and mental ill-health-related presentations at the patient level.

resultsGiven that this paper serves as a protocol, there are currently no results available. The deidentified primary health data were sourced from electronic medical records of approximately 4,717,000 patients from 542 consenting general practices over a 6-year period (2017-2022). The submission of results for publication is planned for early 2024.

conclusionsThis study will add to the limited evidence base to help understand the impact of opioid policies in Australia, including whether intended or unintended outcomes are occurring as a result.

trial registrationEU PAS Register EUPAS104005; https://www.encepp.eu/encepp/viewResource.htm?id=104006. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/51825.

Indexed as

data linkagedrug policygeneral practiceopioidprimary care

Identifiers

PMID37847553
PMCPMC10618880
OpenAlexW4386030086

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.