Evidence mapPaperPMID 37848291Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Identifying costs in health professions education: a scoping review protocol.

Jennifer Yaros, Chloe de Mortier, Mirjam G A Oude Egbrink, Silvia Evers, Aggie Paulus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Cost and Challenges of Clinical Competency Committees and Milestones Assessment.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer YarosHealth Services Research, Maastricht University, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands j.yaros@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-4976-5202
Chloe de MortierHealth Services Research, Maastricht University, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Mirjam G A Oude EgbrinkSchool of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Silvia EversHealth Services Research, Maastricht University, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Aggie PaulusHealth Services Research, Maastricht University, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProfound changes in the healthcare sector and the growing, global shortage of healthcare workers are driving the demand to update and scale-up health professions education (HPE). At the same time, educational institutions are faced with increasing resource scarcity and decisions of where and how to allocate resources must be made conscious of costs. However, costs are known to be inaccurately and incompletely identified in HPE research. Therefore, to improve rigour in cost evidence and enable its use in decision-making, it is necessary to have a better understanding of the costs, stakeholders and cost identification methods being used in HPE research. This protocol has been developed to outline the rationale and methods for a scoping review of the literature intended to map the current state of cost and cost identification evidence in HPE. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol is developed in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. PubMed, ERIC, CINAHL and PsycInfo will be scoped for all types of English language publications from 2012 to 2022 that investigate costs associated with the education of health professionals. Two independent reviewers will assess publications for eligibility. Data will be extracted on the educational topic and context, the costs, cost types, perspectives and methods of cost identification as represented in the literature. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No human participants are involved in this scoping review. All evidence for this study are sourced from public databases; therefore, ethical approval was not required. Final results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presented at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:

Indexed as

Academies and InstitutesConsciousnessDatabases, FactualEducational StatusHealth OccupationsHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicEDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training)Health economicsMEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING

Identifiers

PMID37848291
PMCPMC10582908

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.