Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37848726›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

CXCL5 and CXCL14, but not CXCL16 as potential biomarkers of colorectal cancer.

Monika Zajkowska, Maciej Dulewicz, Agnieszka Kulczyńska-Przybik, Kamil Safiejko, Marcin Juchimiuk, Marzena Konopko, Leszek Kozłowski, Barbara Mroczko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monika ZajkowskaDepartment of Neurodegeneration Diagnostics, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-269, Bialystok, Poland. monika.zajkowska@umb.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5179-0722
Maciej DulewiczDepartment of Neurodegeneration Diagnostics, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-269, Bialystok, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7149-017X
Agnieszka Kulczyńska-PrzybikDepartment of Neurodegeneration Diagnostics, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-269, Bialystok, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9889-3585
Kamil SafiejkoDepartment of Oncological Surgery with Specialized Cancer Treatment Units, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Oncology Center, 15-027, Bialystok, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0373-9911
Marcin JuchimiukDepartment of Oncological Surgery with Specialized Cancer Treatment Units, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Oncology Center, 15-027, Bialystok, Poland.
Marzena KonopkoDepartment of Oncological Surgery with Specialized Cancer Treatment Units, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Oncology Center, 15-027, Bialystok, Poland.
Leszek KozłowskiDepartment of Oncological Surgery with Specialized Cancer Treatment Units, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Oncology Center, 15-027, Bialystok, Poland.
Barbara MroczkoDepartment of Neurodegeneration Diagnostics, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-269, Bialystok, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4075-8479
Medical University of Białystok · PLThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experts emphasize that colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality are increasing. That is why its early detection is of the utmost importance. Patients with cancer diagnosed in earlier stages have a better prognosis and a chance for faster implementation of treatment. Consequently, it is vital to search for new parameters that could be useful in its diagnosis. Therefore, we evaluated the usefulness of CXCL5, CXCL14 and CXCL16 in serum of 115 participants (75 CRC patients and 40 healthy volunteers). Concentrations of all parameters were measured using Luminex. CRP (C-reactive protein) levels were determined by immunoturbidimetry, while levels of classical tumor markers were measured using CMIA (Chemiluminescence Microparticle Immunoassay). Concentrations of CXCL5 were statistically higher in the CRC group when compared to healthy controls. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) of CXCL5 and CXCL14 were higher than those of CA 19-9. Obtained results suggest the usefulness of CXCL5 and CXCL16 in the determination of distant metastases and differentiation between TNM (Tumor-Node-Metastasis) stages, as well as the usefulness of CXCL14 and CRP combination in CRC detection (primary or recurrence). However, further studies concerning their role in CRC progression are crucial to confirm and explain their diagnostic utility and clinical application as biomarkers.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenChemokine CXCL16Chemokine CXCL5Chemokines, CXCHumansPrognosisROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenChemokine CXCL16Chemokine CXCL5Chemokines, CXCCXCL14 protein, humanCXCL16 protein, humanCXCL5 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID37848726
PMCPMC10582048
OpenAlexW4387701359

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.