Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37853325›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2023

Genomic prediction based on selective linkage disequilibrium pruning of low-coverage whole-genome sequence variants in a pure Duroc population.

Di Zhu, Yiqiang Zhao, Ran Zhang, Hanyu Wu, Gengyuan Cai, Zhenfang Wu, Yuzhe Wang, Xiaoxiang Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Di ZhuState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Yiqiang ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Ran ZhangState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Hanyu WuState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Gengyuan CaiNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong, China.
Zhenfang WuNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong, China. wzfemail@163.com.
Yuzhe WangNational Research Facility for Phenotypic and Genotypic Analysis of Model Animals (Beijing), China Agricultural University, Beijing, China. yuzhe891@cau.edu.cn.
Xiaoxiang HuState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China. huxx@cau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7045-0283

Funding

948 Program of the Ministry of Agriculture of China 2012-G1 (4)Open Research Program of State Key Laboratory for Agro-Biotechnology 2020SKLAB6-25Science and Technology Innovation Strategy Projects of Guangdong Province 2019B020203002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the accumulation of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data has accelerated the identification of mutations underlying complex traits, its impact on the accuracy of genomic predictions is limited. Reliable genotyping data and pre-selected beneficial loci can be used to improve prediction accuracy. Previously, we reported a low-coverage sequencing genotyping method that yielded 11.3 million highly accurate single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in pigs. Here, we introduce a method termed selective linkage disequilibrium pruning (SLDP), which refines the set of SNPs that show a large gain during prediction of complex traits using whole-genome SNP data.

resultsWe used the SLDP method to identify and select markers among millions of SNPs based on genome-wide association study (GWAS) prior information. We evaluated the performance of SLDP with respect to three real traits and six simulated traits with varying genetic architectures using two representative models (genomic best linear unbiased prediction and BayesR) on samples from 3579 Duroc boars. SLDP was determined by testing 180 combinations of two core parameters (GWAS P-value thresholds and linkage disequilibrium r

conclusionsThe SLDP marker selection method can be incorporated into mainstream prediction models to yield accuracy improvements for traits with a relatively simple genetic architecture, however, it has no significant advantage for traits not controlled by major QTL. The main factors that affect its performance are the genetic architecture of traits and the reliability of GWAS prior information. Our findings can facilitate the application of WGS-based genomic selection.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsAnimalsGenotypeLinkage DisequilibriumMalePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociReproducibility of ResultsSwine

Identifiers

PMID37853325
PMCPMC10583454

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.