Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37854535›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base2023

The State of Machine Learning in Outcomes Prediction of Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Darrion B Yang, Alexander D Smith, Emily J Smith, Anant Naik, Mika Janbahan, Charee M Thompson, Lav R Varshney, Wael Hassaneen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Darrion B YangCarle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4396-7644
Alexander D SmithCarle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States.
Emily J SmithCarle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States.
Anant NaikCarle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7491-5401
Mika JanbahanCarle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States.
Charee M ThompsonDepartment of Communication, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States.
Lav R VarshneyDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States.
Wael HassaneenCarle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9676-3007

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this analysis is to assess the use of machine learning (ML) algorithms in the prediction of postoperative outcomes, including complications, recurrence, and death in transsphenoidal surgery. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically reviewed all papers that used at least one ML algorithm to predict outcomes after transsphenoidal surgery. We searched Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases for studies published prior to May 12, 2021. We identified 13 studies enrolling 5,048 patients. We extracted the general characteristics of each study; the sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC) of the ML models developed as well as the features identified as important by the ML models. We identified 12 studies with 5,048 patients that included ML algorithms for adenomas, three with 1807 patients specifically for acromegaly, and five with 2105 patients specifically for Cushing's disease. Nearly all were single-institution studies. The studies used a heterogeneous mix of ML algorithms and features to build predictive models. All papers reported an AUC greater than 0.7, which indicates clinical utility. ML algorithms have the potential to predict postoperative outcomes of transsphenoidal surgery and can improve patient care. Ensemble algorithms and neural networks were often top performers when compared with other ML algorithms. Biochemical and preoperative features were most likely to be selected as important by ML models. Inexplicability remains a challenge, but algorithms such as local interpretable model-agnostic explanation or Shapley value can increase explainability of ML algorithms. Our analysis shows that ML algorithms have the potential to greatly assist surgeons in clinical decision making.

Indexed as

acromegalyartificial intelligenceCushing's diseasemachine learningpituitary adenomastranssphenoidal surgery

Identifiers

PMID37854535
PMCPMC10581827

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.