Evidence mapPaperPMID 37856174Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Patient and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Patient Access to Test Results via Web Portals: Scoping Review.

Olga Petrovskaya, Albina Karpman, Joanna Schilling, Simran Singh, Larissa Wegren, Vera Caine, Elizabeth Kusi-Appiah, Willow Geen

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Cancer Education in the Era of Immediate Results Access.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  5. The Effects of an Online Patient Portal on Nurses' and the Health Care Team's Work in an Outpatient Oncology Setting: A Qualitative Study.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Physician Orders for Waiting Room Patients: Ethical Considerations.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Emotional Intelligence In The Inpatient Setting.Journal of Brown hospital medicine · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olga PetrovskayaSchool of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5929-3598
Albina KarpmanFaculty of Nursing, MacEwan University, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8808-299X
Joanna SchillingSchool of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0006-9957-6190
Simran SinghFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-4118-9792
Larissa WegrenSouth Health Campus, Women's Health, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3847-7643
Vera CaineSchool of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5561-8156
Elizabeth Kusi-AppiahFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-3106-2880
Willow GeenSchool of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-9154-3477

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA frequently used feature of electronic patient portals is the viewing of test results. Research on patient portals is abundant and offers evidence to help portal implementers make policy and practice decisions. In contrast, no comparable comprehensive summary of research addresses the direct release of and patient access to test results.

objectiveThis scoping review aims to analyze and synthesize published research focused on patient and health care provider perspectives on the direct release of laboratory, imaging, and radiology results to patients via web portals.

methodsPRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. Searches were conducted in CINAHL, MEDLINE, and other databases. Citations were screened in Covidence using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary studies that focused on patient and health care provider perspectives on patient access to laboratory and imaging results via web portals were included. An updated search was conducted up to August 2023. Our review included 27 articles-20 examining patient views, 3 examining provider views, and 4 examining both patient and provider views. Data extraction and inductive data analysis were informed by sensitizing concepts from sociomaterial perspectives, and 15 themes were generated.

resultsPatient perspectives (24 papers) were synthesized using nine themes: (1) patterns of use and patient characteristics; (2) emotional response when viewing the results and uncertainty about their implications; (3) understanding test results; (4) preferences for mode and timing of result release; (5). information seeking and patients' actions motivated by viewing results via a portal; (6) contemplating changes in behavior and managing own health; (7) benefits of accessing test results via a portal; (8) limitations of accessing test results via a portal; and (9) suggestions for portal improvement. Health care provider perspectives (7 papers) were synthetized into six themes: (1) providers' view of benefits of patient access to results via the portal; (2) effects on health care provider workload; (3) concerns about patient anxiety; (4) timing of result release into the patient portal; (5) the method of result release into the patient portal: manual versus automatic release; and (6) the effects of hospital health information technology system on patient quality outcomes.

conclusionsThe timing of the release of test results emerged as a particularly important topic. In some countries, the policy context may motivate immediate release of most tests directly into patient portals. However, our findings aim to make policy makers, health administrators, and other stakeholders aware of factors to consider when making decisions about the timing of result release. This review is sensitive to the characteristics of patient populations and portal technology and can inform result release framework policies. The findings are timely, as patient portals have become more common internationally.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPatient PortalsAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelHumansPatientsdiagnostic imagingelectronic health recordsembargolaboratory test resultslaboratory testsMyChartpatient access to recordspatient portalpersonal health recordsradiology reportsresult releasethe Cures Actweb portal

Identifiers

PMID37856174
PMCPMC10623227

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.