Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37856442›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

OpenCap: Human movement dynamics from smartphone videos.

Scott D Uhlrich, Antoine Falisse, Łukasz Kidziński, Julie Muccini, Michael Ko, Akshay S Chaudhari, Jennifer L Hicks, Scott L Delp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 165 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
165citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

165 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Geometric Feature Relationship-Based Knowledge Distillation for Ground Reaction Force Estimation.Measurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Scott D UhlrichDepartments of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3113-367X
Antoine FalisseDepartments of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9541-0886
Łukasz KidzińskiDepartments of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Julie MucciniRadiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6118-4999
Michael KoRadiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Akshay S ChaudhariRadiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Jennifer L HicksDepartments of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Scott L DelpDepartments of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.

Funding

TR&D Project 3: OpenSim for PredictionP41EB027060 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SCOTT L DELP · 2020 to 2026
$9.7M
Rapid Low-Cost Quantitative 3D MRI and Gait Assessment of the KneeR01AR077604 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HARGREAVES, BRIAN ANDREW · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR077604NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measures of human movement dynamics can predict outcomes like injury risk or musculoskeletal disease progression. However, these measures are rarely quantified in large-scale research studies or clinical practice due to the prohibitive cost, time, and expertise required. Here we present and validate OpenCap, an open-source platform for computing both the kinematics (i.e., motion) and dynamics (i.e., forces) of human movement using videos captured from two or more smartphones. OpenCap leverages pose estimation algorithms to identify body landmarks from videos; deep learning and biomechanical models to estimate three-dimensional kinematics; and physics-based simulations to estimate muscle activations and musculoskeletal dynamics. OpenCap's web application enables users to collect synchronous videos and visualize movement data that is automatically processed in the cloud, thereby eliminating the need for specialized hardware, software, and expertise. We show that OpenCap accurately predicts dynamic measures, like muscle activations, joint loads, and joint moments, which can be used to screen for disease risk, evaluate intervention efficacy, assess between-group movement differences, and inform rehabilitation decisions. Additionally, we demonstrate OpenCap's practical utility through a 100-subject field study, where a clinician using OpenCap estimated musculoskeletal dynamics 25 times faster than a laboratory-based approach at less than 1% of the cost. By democratizing access to human movement analysis, OpenCap can accelerate the incorporation of biomechanical metrics into large-scale research studies, clinical trials, and clinical practice.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSmartphoneBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMovementMusclesSoftware

Identifiers

PMID37856442
PMCPMC10586693

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.