Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37857898›Full record

SynthesisPsychopharmacology2024

Venlafaxine's therapeutic reference range in the treatment of depression revised: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

X M Lense, C Hiemke, C S M Funk, U Havemann-Reinecke, G Hefner, A Menke, R Mössner, T G Riemer, M Scherf-Clavel, G Schoretsanitis and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychopharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Influence ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

X M LenseDepartment of Molecular Neuroimaging, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 68159 University J5, Mannheim, Germany. Xenija.Lense@umm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3302-7109
C HiemkeClinic of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
C S M FunkInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Charité University, Berlin, Germany.
U Havemann-ReineckeArbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP), Working Group "Therapeutic Drug Monitoring", Munich, Germany.
G HefnerArbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP), Working Group "Therapeutic Drug Monitoring", Munich, Germany.
A MenkeArbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP), Working Group "Therapeutic Drug Monitoring", Munich, Germany.
R MössnerArbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP), Working Group "Therapeutic Drug Monitoring", Munich, Germany.
T G RiemerInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Charité University, Berlin, Germany.
M Scherf-ClavelArbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP), Working Group "Therapeutic Drug Monitoring", Munich, Germany.
G SchoretsanitisArbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP), Working Group "Therapeutic Drug Monitoring", Munich, Germany.
G GründerDepartment of Molecular Neuroimaging, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 68159 University J5, Mannheim, Germany.
X M HartDepartment of Molecular Neuroimaging, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 68159 University J5, Mannheim, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEKlinik für Psychosomatik · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHVitos · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor venlafaxine is among the most prescribed antidepressant drugs worldwide and, according to guidelines, its dose titration should be guided by drug-level monitoring of its active moiety (AM) which consists of venlafaxine (VEN) plus active metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODV). This indication of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), however, assumes a clear concentration/effect relationship for a drug, which for VEN has not been systematically explored yet.

objectivesWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between blood levels, efficacy, and adverse reactions in order to suggest an optimal target concentration range for VEN oral formulations for the treatment of depression.

methodsFour databases (MEDLINE (PubMed), PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Library) were systematically searched in March 2022 for relevant articles according to a previously published protocol. Reviewers independently screened references and performed data extraction and critical appraisal.

resultsHigh-quality randomized controlled trials investigating concentration/efficacy relationships and studies using a placebo lead-in phase were not found. Sixty-eight articles, consisting mostly of naturalistic TDM studies or small noncontrolled studies, met the eligibility criteria. Of them, five cohort studies reported a positive correlation between blood levels and antidepressant effects after VEN treatment. Our meta-analyses showed (i) higher AM and (ii) higher ODV concentrations in patients responding to VEN treatment when compared to non-responders (n = 360, k = 5). AM concentration-dependent occurrence of tremor was reported in one study. We found a linear relationship between daily dose and AM concentration within guideline recommended doses (75-225 mg/day). The population-based concentration ranges (25-75% interquartile) among 11 studies (n = 3200) using flexible dosing were (i) 225-450 ng/ml for the AM and (ii) 144-302 ng/ml for ODV. One PET study reported an occupancy of 80% serotonin transporters for ODV serum levels above 85 ng/ml. Based on our findings, we propose a therapeutic reference range for AM of 140-600 ng/ml.

conclusionVEN TDM within a range of 140 to 600 ng/ml (AM) will increase the probability of response in nonresponders. A titration within the proposed reference range is recommended in case of non-response at lower drug concentrations as a consequence of VEN's dual mechanism of action via combined serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition. Drug titration towards higher concentrations will, however, increase the risk for ADRs, in particular with supratherapeutic drug concentrations.

Indexed as

DepressionVenlafaxine HydrochlorideAntidepressive AgentsDesvenlafaxine SuccinateHumansNorepinephrineReference ValuesSerotoninAntidepressive AgentsDesvenlafaxine SuccinateNorepinephrineSerotoninVenlafaxine HydrochlorideAntidepressantDepressionVenlafaxine

Identifiers

PMID37857898
PMCPMC10806172
OpenAlexW4387769060

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.