ReviewBritish journal of haematology2023
Quantitative interpretation of bone marrow biopsies in MPN-What's the point in a molecular age?
Review in British journal of haematology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancements in bone marrow biopsy: the role of omics and artificial intelligence in hematologic diagnostics.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- AI-driven prognostics in pediatric bone marrow transplantation: a CAD approach with Bayesian and PSO optimization.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- The utility of automated artificial intelligence-assisted digital cytomorphology for bone marrow analysis in diagnostic haemato-oncology.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Application of IVIM in the assessment of the spleen in patients with myelofibrosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Application of Pathomic Features for Differentiating Dysplastic Cells in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Quantitative interpretation of bone marrow biopsies in MPN-What's the point in a molecular age?British journal of haematology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The diagnosis of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) requires the integration of clinical, morphological, genetic and immunophenotypic findings. Recently, there has been a transformation in our understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying disease initiation and progression in MPN. This has been accompanied by the widespread application of high-resolution quantitative molecular techniques. By contrast, microscopic interpretation of bone marrow biopsies by haematologists/haematopathologists remains subjective and qualitative. However, advances in tissue image analysis and artificial intelligence (AI) promise to transform haematopathology. Pioneering studies in bone marrow image analysis offer to refine our understanding of the boundaries between reactive samples and MPN subtypes and better capture the morphological correlates of high-risk disease. They also demonstrate potential to improve the evaluation of current and novel therapeutics for MPN and other blood cancers. With increased therapeutic targeting of diverse molecular, cellular and extra-cellular components of the marrow, these approaches can address the unmet need for improved objective and quantitative measures of disease modification in the context of clinical trials. This review focuses on the state-of-the-art in image analysis/AI of bone marrow tissue, with an emphasis on its potential to complement and inform future clinical studies and research in MPN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.