ArticleBioactive materials2024
High temperature oxidation treated 3D printed anatomical WE43 alloy scaffolds for repairing periarticular bone defects:
Article in Bioactive materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A bioactive magnesium alloy scaffold integrated with BMSCs-Loaded 3D microspheres synergistically promotes femoral head osteonecrosis repair by improving the osteogenic-angiogenic microenvironment.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Reconstructing the ischemic osteogenic microenvironment through hierarchical scaffolds orchestrating MgBioactive materials · 2026Article
- Metallic topological structures in bone repair implants: Design, properties, and biological interactions.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- A protonation/degradation dual control pH-responsive LVF delivery system with rod-shaped core-shell structure for the treatment of bone infections.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Bolstered bone regeneration by multiscale customized magnesium scaffolds with hierarchical structures and tempered degradation.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Versatile application of magnesium-related bone implants in the treatment of bone defects.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Research progress on the role and mechanism of magnesium-containing materials in bone repair.Biomaterials translational · 2025Review
- Magnesium as an emerging bioactive material for orthopedic applications: bedside needs lead the way from innovation to clinical translation.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
- Insight the long-term biodegradable Mg-RE-Sr alloy for orthopaedics implant via friction stir processing.Bioactive materials · 2024Article
- Developing fibrin-based biomaterials/scaffolds in tissue engineering.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reconstruction of subarticular bone defects is an intractable challenge in orthopedics. The simultaneous repair of cancellous defects, fractures, and cartilage damage is an ideal surgical outcome. 3D printed porous anatomical WE43 (magnesium with 4 wt% yttrium and 3 wt% rare earths) scaffolds have many advantages for repairing such bone defects, including good biocompatibility, appropriate mechanical strength, customizable shape and structure, and biodegradability. In a previous investigation, we successfully enhanced the corrosion resistance of WE43 samples via high temperature oxidation (HTO). In the present study, we explored the feasibility and effectiveness of HTO-treated 3D printed porous anatomical WE43 scaffolds for repairing the cancellous bone defects accompanied by split fractures via in vitro and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.