ReviewFrontiers in synaptic neuroscience2023
Distinctive biophysical features of human cell-types: insights from studies of neurosurgically resected brain tissue.
Review in Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptive Network Stabilization Despite Profound Structural Reorganization in Human Organotypic Cultures.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Dendritic morphology and synaptic nonlinearities enhance functional complexity in human cortical neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Enhanced information processing in the human neocortex: cellular mechanisms and translational perspectives.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2026Review
- Processing and sectioning of organ donor spinal cord tissue for electrophysiology on acute human spinal cord slices.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Resolving native GABANature · 2025Article
- Morphological variability may limit single-cell specificity to electric field stimulation.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2025Article
- Biophysical and computational insights from modeling human cortical pyramidal neurons.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
- What makes human cortical pyramidal neurons functionally complex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrophysiological characterization of live human tissue from epilepsy patients has been performed for many decades. Although initially these studies sought to understand the biophysical and synaptic changes associated with human epilepsy, recently, it has become the mainstay for exploring the distinctive biophysical and synaptic features of human cell-types. Both epochs of these human cellular electrophysiological explorations have faced criticism. Early studies revealed that cortical pyramidal neurons obtained from individuals with epilepsy appeared to function "normally" in comparison to neurons from non-epilepsy controls or neurons from other species and thus there was little to gain from the study of human neurons from epilepsy patients. On the other hand, contemporary studies are often questioned for the "normalcy" of the recorded neurons since they are derived from epilepsy patients. In this review, we discuss our current understanding of the distinct biophysical features of human cortical neurons and glia obtained from tissue removed from patients with epilepsy and tumors. We then explore the concept of within cell-type diversity and its loss (i.e., "neural homogenization"). We introduce neural homogenization to help reconcile the epileptogenicity of seemingly "normal" human cortical cells and circuits. We propose that there should be continued efforts to study cortical tissue from epilepsy patients in the quest to understand what makes human cell-types "human".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.