Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37864810›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2023

Efficacy and safety of community-based moxibustion for primary hypertension: A randomized controlled trial with patient preference arms.

Xu Zhou, Qiuyun Xue, Jianyu You, Shuqing Li, Ling Li, Weifeng Zhu, Yong Fu, Xin Sun

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xu ZhouEvidence-Based Medicine Research Center, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Qiuyun XueGraduate School, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Jianyu YouGraduate School, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Shuqing LiGraduate School, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Ling LiChinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Weifeng ZhuEvidence-Based Medicine Research Center, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Yong FuFirst Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9541-4796
Xin SunEvidence-Based Medicine Research Center, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

China Medical Board No. CMB19-324Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Innovation Team Development Program No. CXTD-22012National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 81904057National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars No. 82225049Top Discipline of Jiangxi Province, Discipline of Chinese and Western Integrative Medicine, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine No. zxyylxk20220103Young Qihuang Scholar Project of National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine GCS [2022] No.56 Fu Yong
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Moxibustion has been shown to have a potential antihypertensive effect, but its applicability for the primary care of hypertension is unclear. The authors conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) with patient preference arms to investigate the effect, safety, cost-effectiveness, and compliance of moxibustion in community patients with hypertension. Patients with primary hypertension were enrolled from seven communities randomly or nonrandomly assigned to receive self-administered moxibustion + the original hypertensive regimen or the original hypertensive regimen alone for 6 months. The authors mainly evaluated the effects of moxibustion on hypertensive outcomes and adverse events. As a result, a total of 160 and 240 patients were recruited into the randomized and nonrandomized arms, respectively, with 87.5% completing the follow-up. At month 6, there was a significantly greater reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (difference: -10.57 mmHg), a higher proportion of responders (82.2% vs. 53.7%; odds ratio 4.00), and better improvements in hypertensive symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in the moxibustion group than in the control group in the randomized population, but there was no significant between-group difference in diastolic blood pressure (DBP). The nonrandomized findings showed the same effect direction for all outcomes, except for DBP. All moxibustion-related adverse events were mild. In conclusion, moxibustion can reduce SBP and improve hypertensive symptoms and QoL in community patients with hypertension, with good safety and low cost, although its effect on DBP remains uncertain. The findings suggest that moxibustion may be an appropriate technique for community primary care of hypertension.

Indexed as

HypertensionMoxibustionAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureEssential HypertensionHumansPatient PreferenceAntihypertensive Agentscommunitymoxibustionpatient preference trialprimary hypertensionrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID37864810
PMCPMC10710558
OpenAlexW4387843649

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.