ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
Development and validation of risk prediction and neural network models for dilated cardiomyopathy based on WGCNA.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a progressive heart condition characterized by ventricular dilatation and impaired myocardial contractility with a high mortality rate. The molecular characterization of DCM has not been determined yet. Therefore, it is crucial to discover potential biomarkers and therapeutic options for DCM. Methods: The hub genes for the DCM were screened using Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) and three different algorithms in Cytoscape. These genes were then validated in a mouse model of doxorubicin (DOX)-induced DCM. Based on the validated hub genes, a prediction model and a neural network model were constructed and validated in a separate dataset. Finally, we assessed the diagnostic efficiency of hub genes and their relationship with immune cells. Results: A total of eight hub genes were identified. Using RT-qPCR, we validated that the expression levels of five key genes (ASPN, MFAP4, PODN, HTRA1, and FAP) were considerably higher in DCM mice compared to normal mice, and this was consistent with the microarray results. Additionally, the risk prediction and neural network models constructed from these genes showed good accuracy and sensitivity in both the combined and validation datasets. These genes also demonstrated better diagnostic power, with AUC greater than 0.7 in both the combined and validation datasets. Immune cell infiltration analysis revealed differences in the abundance of most immune cells between DCM and normal samples. Conclusion: The current findings indicate an underlying association between DCM and these key genes, which could serve as potential biomarkers for diagnosing and treating DCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.