Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37870834›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Hypertension Diagnosis, Treatment, and Control in India.

Jithin Sam Varghese, Nikhil Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthy, Nikkil Sudharsanan, Panniyammakal Jeemon, Shivani A Patel, Harsha Thirumurthy, Ambuj Roy, Nikhil Tandon, K M Venkat Narayan, Dorairaj Prabhakaran and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The landscape of dementia in India: Prevalence, risk factors, and opportunities ahead.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jithin Sam VargheseEmory Global Diabetes Research Center, Woodruff Health Sciences Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Nikhil Srinivasapura VenkateshmurthyPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Nikkil SudharsananProfessorship of Behavioral Science for Disease Prevention and Health Care, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Panniyammakal JeemonAchutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, India.
Shivani A PatelEmory Global Diabetes Research Center, Woodruff Health Sciences Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Harsha ThirumurthyLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Ambuj RoyDepartment of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Nikhil TandonDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
K M Venkat NarayanEmory Global Diabetes Research Center, Woodruff Health Sciences Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Dorairaj PrabhakaranPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Mohammed K AliEmory Global Diabetes Research Center, Woodruff Health Sciences Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

Integrated Tracking, Referral, and Algorithmic Management (I-TREC) System for Hypertension and DiabetesU01HL138635 · NHLBI · ALL-INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES · PI TANDON, NIKHIL · 2017 to 2021
$1.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL138635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Hypertension is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Previous efforts to characterize gaps in the hypertension care continuum-including diagnosis, treatment, and control-in India did not assess district-level variation. Local data are critical for planning, implementation, and monitoring efforts to curb the burden of hypertension. Objective: To examine the hypertension care continuum in India among individuals aged 18 to 98 years. Design, Setting, and Participants: The nationally representative Fifth National Family Health Survey study was conducted in 2 phases from June 17, 2019, to March 21, 2020, and from November 21, 2020, to April 30, 2021, among 1 895 297 individuals in 28 states, 8 union territories, and 707 districts of India. Exposures: District and state of residence, urban classification, age (18-39, 40-64, and ≥65 years), sex, and household wealth quintile. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hypertension was defined as a self-reported diagnosis or a newly measured blood pressure of 140/90 mm Hg or more. The proportion of individuals diagnosed (self-reported), the proportion of individuals treated among those diagnosed (self-reported medication use), and the proportion of individuals with blood pressure control among those treated (blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg [aged 18-79 years] or <150/90 mm Hg [aged ≥80 years]) were calculated based on national guidelines. Age-standardized estimates of treatment and control were also provided among the total with hypertension. To assess differences in the care continuum between or within states (ie, between districts), the variance was partitioned using generalized linear mixed models. Results: Of the 1 691 036 adult respondents (52.6% women; mean [SD] age, 41.6 [16.5] years), 28.1% (95% CI, 27.9%-28.3%) had hypertension, of whom 36.9% (95% CI, 36.4%-37.3%) received a diagnosis. Among those who received a diagnosis, 44.7% (95% CI, 44.1%-45.3%) reported taking medication (corresponding to 17.7% [95% CI, 17.5%-17.9%] of the total with hypertension). Among those treated, 52.5% (95% CI, 51.7%-53.4%) had blood pressure control (corresponding to 8.5% [95% CI, 8.3%-8.6%] of the total with hypertension). There were substantial variations across districts in blood pressure diagnosis (range, 6.3%-77.5%), treatment (range, 8.7%-97.1%), and control (range, 2.7%-76.6%). Large proportions of the variation in hypertension diagnosis (94.7%), treatment (93.6%), and control (97.3%) were within states, not just between states. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional survey study of Indian adults, more than 1 in 4 people had hypertension, and of these, only 1 in 3 received a diagnosis, less than 1 in 5 were treated, and only 1 in 12 had blood pressure control. National mean values hide considerable state-level and district-level variation in the care continuum, suggesting the need for targeted, decentralized solutions to improve the hypertension care continuum in India.

Indexed as

HypertensionAdultBlood PressureCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID37870834
PMCPMC10594142

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.