Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37872273›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2023

Identification and cultivation of anaerobic bacterial scavengers of dead cells.

Yuga Hirakata, Ran Mei, Kana Morinaga, Taiki Katayama, Hideyuki Tamaki, Xian-Ying Meng, Takahiro Watari, Takashi Yamaguchi, Masashi Hatamoto, Masaru K Nobu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Enhanced vitamin BSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Enhancement of vitamin BMicrobial cell factories · 2024
    Article
  9. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yuga HirakataBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, 305-8566, Japan. y-hirakata@aist.go.jp.
Ran MeiBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, 305-8566, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6464-6519
Kana MorinagaBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, 305-8566, Japan.
Taiki KatayamaGeomicrobiology Research Group, Research Institute for Geo-Resources and Environment, Geological Survey of Japan (GSJ), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, 305-8567, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2964-7628
Hideyuki TamakiBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, 305-8566, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9208-1247
Xian-Ying MengBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, 305-8566, Japan.
Takahiro WatariDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, 940-2188, Japan.
Takashi YamaguchiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, 940-2188, Japan.
Masashi HatamotoDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, 940-2188, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8571-1159
Masaru K NobuBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, 305-8566, Japan. mnobu@jamstec.go.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-0046-9306

Funding

MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 18H03367MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 22K18046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cycle of life and death and Earth's carbon cycle(s) are intimately linked, yet how bacterial cells, one of the largest pools of biomass on Earth, are recycled back into the carbon cycle remains enigmatic. In particular, no bacteria capable of scavenging dead cells in oxygen-depleted environments have been reported thus far. In this study, we discover the first anaerobes that scavenge dead cells and the two isolated strains use distinct strategies. Based on live-cell imaging, transmission electron microscopy, and hydrolytic enzyme assays, one strain (designated CYCD) relied on cell-to-cell contact and cell invagination for degrading dead food bacteria where as the other strain (MGCD) degraded dead food bacteria via excretion of lytic extracellular enzymes. Both strains could degrade dead cells of differing taxonomy (bacteria and archaea) and differing extents of cell damage, including those without artificially inflicted physical damage. In addition, both depended on symbiotic metabolic interactions for maximizing cell degradation, representing the first cultured syntrophic Bacteroidota. We collectively revealed multiple symbiotic bacterial decomposition routes of dead prokaryotic cells, providing novel insight into the last step of the carbon cycle.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacteria, AnaerobicAnaerobiosisArchaeaEnvironment

Identifiers

PMID37872273
PMCPMC10689501

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.