Evidence mapPaperPMID 37874122Full record

GuidelineDeutsches Arzteblatt international2023

Clinical Practice Guideline: Shared Decision Making, Diagnostic Evaluation, and Pharmacotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes.

Christina Brockamp, Rüdiger Landgraf, Ulrich Alfons Müller, Dirk Müller-Wieland, Frank Petrak, Til Uebel, the National Disease Management Guideline Group

Open access · greenAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Target Corridor for Older People not Justified.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024
    Article
  6. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christina BrockampAgency for Quality in Medicine (AZQ), Berlin, Germany; German Diabetes Foundation (DDS), Düsseldorf, Germany; Medical Practice for Endocrinology and Diabetology, Jena, MVZ Dr. med. Kielstein Ambulante Medizinische Versorgung GmbH Erfurt, Germany; Department of Medicine I, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Germany; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LWL-University Clinic Bochum, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; Center for Psychotherapy Wiesbaden MVZ GmbH; Primary physicians' offices Ittlingen and Neckargmünd, Germany, Specialists in diabetology.
Rüdiger Landgraf
Ulrich Alfons Müller
Dirk Müller-Wieland
Frank Petrak
Til Uebel
the National Disease Management Guideline Group
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundType 2 diabetes is one of the most important widespread diseases worldwide. In Germany, nearly one in five persons over age 65 has type 2 diabetes. The German National Disease Management Guideline for Type 2 Diabetes (NDMG; in German: Nationale Versorgungsleitlinie, NVL) contains updated recommendations for the diagnostic evaluation and pharmacotherapy of this disease as well as information about specific groups of people for whom early detection may be useful.

methodsThe guideline has been updated, chapter by chapter, since 2018. Its recommendations are based on systematically searched and evaluated scientific evidence, the clinical expertise of a multidisciplinary panel of experts, and patient perspectives.

resultsThe new chapter on shared decision making includes a description of a structured approach that can be used when individual treatment goals have not been achieved. The diagnosis of diabetes newly requires at least two abnormally elevated laboratory values: e.g., fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL (≥ 7.0 mmol/L), HbA1c ≥ 6.5 % (≥ 48 mmol/mol) and/or casual plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL (≥ 11.1 mmol/L). Cardiovascular and renal risks are to be considered in the choice of drug. Studies have shown that, in persons with cardiovascular disease, treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1) or SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2) was less likely than the comparison intervention to lead to certain patient-relevant endpoints, including all-cause mortality (OR = 0.88 and 0.84, respectively), hospitalization for heart failure (SGLT2 inhibitors: OR = 0.65), and worsening of renal function (OR = 0.61 and 0.59, respectively).

conclusionCurrent evidence continues to support the recommendations on pharmacotherapy of the 2021 guideline. The Guideline Group did not find evidence of adequate certainty to inform recommendations about the screening of persons at risk, HbA1c target values, or screening for sequelae and comorbidities. Better evidence on these matters would be desirable.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsAgedBlood GlucoseDecision Making, SharedGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID37874122
PMCPMC10777312
OpenAlexW4387893896

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.