Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37874755›Full record

ArticleOncology nursing forum2023

A Scoping Review on Work Experiences of Nurses After Being Diagnosed With Cancer.

Kai-Lin You, Meredith H Cummings, Catherine M Bender, Laura A Fennimore, Margaret Q Rosenzweig, Andrew M Dierkes, Ketki D Raina, Teresa Hagan Thomas

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology nursing forum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kai-Lin YouUniversity of Pittsburgh.
Meredith H CummingsUniversity of Pittsburgh.
Catherine M BenderUniversity of Pittsburgh.
Laura A FennimoreUniversity of Pittsburgh.
Margaret Q RosenzweigUniversity of Pittsburgh.
Andrew M DierkesUniversity of Pittsburgh.
Ketki D RainaUniversity of Pittsburgh.
Teresa Hagan ThomasUniversity of Pittsburgh.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Extension of STRONG Study to Expand Intervention ImpactR37CA262025 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Teresa Hagan Thomas · 2021 to 2026
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA262025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problem identificationTo map key concepts underpinning work-related studies about nurses with cancer and identify knowledge gaps. LITERATURE REVIEW: A search was conducted in the PubMed®, CINAHL®, and PsycINFO® databases for articles about nurses with cancer and work-related topics published through March 2023. DATA EVALUATION: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist was used to report results, and the JBI critical appraisal tools were used to assess the quality of studies. Eleven articles were included. SYNTHESIS: The following four critical concepts were identified: role adjustments at work, cancer impacts on work, organizational support, and translating insights gained from cancer experience into work. Research gaps identified by the scoping review were a lack of theoretical or conceptual frameworks, lack of syntheses of main ideas, and lack of clear data about participants' socioeconomic status across studies. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Minimal research exists to map predictors, outcomes, or intervention targets to guide organizational strategies to support nurses' retention in the nursing workforce. A guiding framework, recruitment of diverse nurses, and focus on the four critical concepts identified in this scoping review are suggested for future research.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsNursing StaffHumanscancerhealthcare workernursesreturn to workscoping reviewwork

Identifiers

PMID37874755
PMCPMC11966740
OpenAlexW4387931286

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.