Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37875557›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Assessing the use of minimally invasive self-sampling at home for long-term monitoring of the microbiota within UK families.

E Nikolaou, E L German, A Howard, H M Nabwera, A Matope, R Robinson, F Shiham, K Liatsikos, C McNamara, S Kattera and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

E Nikolaou *Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. eliza.nikolaou@mcri.edu.au.
E L German *Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
A HowardDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
H M NabweraDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
A MatopeDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
R RobinsonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
F ShihamDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
K LiatsikosDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
C McNamaraAlder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
S KatteraAlder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
K CarterAlder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
C M ParryAlder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
J M ReadLancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
S J AllenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
B C UrbanDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
D B HawcuttAlder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
H HillDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
A M Collins *Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
D M Ferreira *Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. daniela.ferreira@paediatrics.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V030698/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring the presence of commensal and pathogenic respiratory microorganisms is of critical global importance. However, community-based surveillance is difficult because nasopharyngeal swabs are uncomfortable and painful for a wide age range of participants. We designed a methodology for minimally invasive self-sampling at home and assessed its use for longitudinal monitoring of the oral, nasal and hand microbiota of adults and children within families. Healthy families with two adults and up to three children, living in and near Liverpool, United Kingdom, self-collected saliva, nasal lining fluid using synthetic absorptive matrices and hand swabs at home every two weeks for six months. Questionnaires were used to collect demographic and epidemiological data and assess feasibility and acceptability. Participants were invited to take part in an exit interview. Thirty-three families completed the study. Sampling using our approach was acceptable to 25/33 (76%) families, as sampling was fast (76%), easy (76%) and painless (60%). Saliva and hand sampling was acceptable to all participants of any age, whereas nasal sampling was accepted mostly by adults and children older than 5 years. Multi-niche self-sampling at home can be used by adults and children for longitudinal surveillance of respiratory microorganisms, providing key data for design of future studies.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaNoseAdultChildChild, PreschoolHumansSalivaSpecimen HandlingSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37875557
PMCPMC10598218

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.