ArticleTrials2023
Microinvasive pars plana vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling versus anti-VEGF intravitreal injection for treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema (VVV-DME study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05728476 (Microinvasive Pars Plana Vitrectomy Combined ILM Peeling Versus Anti-VEGF Intravitreal Injection for Treatment-naïve Diabetic Macular Edema), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Microinvasive Pars Plana Vitrectomy Combined ILM Peeling Versus Anti-VEGF Intravitreal Injection for Treatment-naïve Diabetic Macular Edema
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- COMPARE COMBINED USE OF ANTI-VEGF DRUGS DURING OR AFTER PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA GUIDED BY MICROSCOPE-INTEGRATED OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY.Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Trial
- Phenotype-driven management of diabetic macular edema: multimodal imaging biomarkers and individualized therapy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Ten-Year Follow-Up of Visual Outcomes After Vitrectomy for Clinically Non-Tractional Diabetic Macular Edema.Cureus · 2025Article
- Pars Plana Vitrectomy and ILM Peeling for Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema Without Vitreomacular Traction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Diabetic macular edema (DME): dissecting pathogenesis, prognostication, diagnostic modalities along with current and futuristic therapeutic insights.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2024Review
- Effects of vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling in patients with diabetic macular edema.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema in vitrectomized versus non-vitrectomized eyes: a Meta-analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic macular edema (DME) is the main cause of vision loss in diabetic patients. Currently, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal injection stands as the first-line therapy for DME. However, some patients exhibit insufficient response to anti-VEGF agents and often require multiple injections, imposing psychological and economic burdens. While microinvasive pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) has been shown to be safe and effective in treating refractory DME, scant research has explored its application to treatment-naïve DME. The purpose of this study is to determine whether early PPV combined with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling can lessen the therapeutic burden of DME patients, prevent vision loss, and maintain long-term stabilization of diabetic retinopathy.
methodsThis is a single-center, prospective, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial involving 102 DME participants. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the study group (PPV combined with ILM peeling) or the control group (conbercept intravitreal injection (IVC)) at a 1:1 ratio, with a scheduled follow-up at 12 months post-operation. Comparative analysis of results between the two groups will be conducted at months 1, 3, 6, and 12 after the intervention. The primary outcomes involve evaluating the changes in central subfield thickness (CST) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The secondary outcomes include assessment of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) biomarkers, re-treatment and adverse events rates, diabetic retinopathy (DR) development, cost-effectiveness analysis, and vision-related quality of life (VRQL). DISCUSSION: Some patients do not respond well to anti-VEGF drugs and repeated intravitreal injections increase the treatment burden for patients. The VVV study aims to explore whether PPV combined with ILM peeling could become an initial treatment option for treatment-naïve DME patients.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05728476. Registered on 15 February 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.