ReviewACS applied bio materials2023
Bioactive Scaffolds as a Promising Alternative for Enhancing Critical-Size Bone Defect Regeneration in the Craniomaxillofacial Region.
Review in ACS applied bio materials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioinspired 3D Printing of Lignocellulose-Based Multimaterial Composites for Extracellular Matrix-Mimicking Architectures.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The role of bioactive molecules in enhancing bone healing in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a review of current approaches and future directions.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Review
- Electrospun CHIR99021-loaded cellulose acetate scaffolds stimulate osteogenic differentiation and mineralization in vitro.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Article
- Propolis-xenograft scaffolds: comparing delivery methods for tibial bone regeneration in rats.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2026Article
- Application and Progress of Loading Strategies in Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Brick by Brick the Wall Is Being Built: Particle-Based Scaffolds for Regenerative Medicine.Polymers · 2025Review
- Comparative Effects of ZnO, MgO, and CaO Nanoparticles in 3D-Printed Chitosan-Agarose Scaffolds on Antibacterial and Osteogenic Outcomes.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025Article
- Macroporous Hydroxyapatite-Based Bone Scaffolds Loaded with CAPE Derivatives: A Strategy to Reduce Oxidative Stress and Biofilm Formation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Synthesis and characterization of 3D gelatin/calcium hydroxide/dentin matrix proteins/propolis scaffolds for hard tissue engineering.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Bioactive, PDMS-containing shape memory composite scaffolds with accelerated degradation rates.Polymer · 2025Article
- MiR-26b-5p/TET3 regulates the osteogenic differentiation of human bone mesenchymal stem cells and bone reconstruction in female rats with calvarial defects.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reconstruction of critical-size bone defects (CSDs) in the craniomaxillofacial (CMF) region remains challenging. Scaffold-based bone-engineered constructs have been proposed as an alternative to the classical treatments made with autografts and allografts. Scaffolds, a key component of engineered constructs, have been traditionally viewed as biologically passive temporary replacements of deficient bone lacking intrinsic cues to promote osteogenesis. Nowadays, scaffolds are functionalized, giving rise to bioactive scaffolds promoting bone regeneration more effectively than conventional counterparts. This review focuses on the three approaches most used to bioactivate scaffolds: (1) conferring microarchitectural designs or surface nanotopography; (2) loading bioactive molecules; and (3) seeding stem cells on scaffolds, providing relevant examples of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.