Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37878849›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2023

Case-Finding tool for COPD in LMIC (COLA) - translation and cross-cultural adaptation into Brazilian Portuguese language.

Erika Zavaglia Kabbach, Naiara Tais Leonardi, Trishul Siddharthan, Audrey Borghi-Silva, Jaber Saud Alqahtani, John R Hurst, Renata Gonçalves Mendes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erika Zavaglia KabbachUniversidade Federal de São Carlos, Department of Physical Therapy, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9975-5766
Naiara Tais LeonardiUniversidade Federal de São Carlos, Department of Physical Therapy, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0762-3932
Trishul SiddharthanUniversity of Miami, Medicine Miller School of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9914-1839
Audrey Borghi-SilvaUniversidade Federal de São Carlos, Department of Physical Therapy, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3891-6941
Jaber Saud AlqahtaniPrince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dammam, Department of Respiratory Care, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1795-5092
John R HurstUniversity College London, UCL Respiratory, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7246-6040
Renata Gonçalves MendesUniversidade Federal de São Carlos, Department of Physical Therapy, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4683-2657

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo translate and cross-culturally adapt the COPD in Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) Assessment (COLA) questionnaire into Brazilian Portuguese, a case-finding instrument for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

methodsTranslation and cross-cultural adaptation were completed in six steps: the original version was translated into Brazilian Portuguese by two native speakers of the target language; the translated versions were synthesized; back-translation was performed by two native speakers of the original language; the back-translation and the Brazilian Portuguese version of the COLA were reviewed and harmonized by an expert committee of specialists; and, then, the pre-final version was tested by 30 health professionals who were asked if the items were clear to understand. The acceptability, clarity, and understandability of the translated version were evaluated. A final review of the questionnaire was produced by the authors and approved by the author of the original questionnaire.

resultsSome idiomatic, semantic, and experiential inconsistencies were identified and properly adjusted. Item 3 was considered the most unclear item (23,3%). Items 7, 8, and 9 presented clarity above 80% (93%, 90%, and 90%, respectively). Suggestions were discussed and incorporated into the tool and COLA was found to be clear and easy to understand.

conclusionsThe Brazilian version of the COLA was easily understood by healthcare professionals and adapted to Brazilian culture. Translation and cultural adaptation of the COLA instrument into Brazilian Portuguese can be an important case-finding instrument for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Brazil.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveBrazilDeveloping CountriesHumansLanguageReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslations

Identifiers

PMID37878849
PMCPMC10519672

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.