ArticleScientific reports2023
Deep proteome coverage advances knowledge of Treponema pallidum protein expression profiles during infection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Proteome Analysis of SevenJournal of proteome research · 2025Article
- The Regulatory Mechanisms of Treponema pallidum Enolase on Macrophages: From Enzymatic Activity to Signal Transduction.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025Article
- High quality transcriptome profiling confirms the transcriptional landscape of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Design of Epitopes fromACS infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Participants inFrontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Article
- Immunodominant extracellular loops ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- In-Depth Proteome Coverage of In Vitro-CulturedJournal of proteome research · 2024Article
- Proteomic analysis of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Comprehensive Overview ofCurrent protein & peptide science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Comprehensive proteome-wide analysis of the syphilis spirochete, Treponema pallidum ssp. pallidum, is technically challenging due to high sample complexity, difficulties with obtaining sufficient quantities of bacteria for analysis, and the inherent fragility of the T. pallidum cell envelope which further complicates proteomic identification of rare T. pallidum outer membrane proteins (OMPs). The main aim of the present study was to gain a deeper understanding of the T. pallidum global proteome expression profile under infection conditions. This will corroborate and extend genome annotations, identify protein modifications that are unable to be predicted at the genomic or transcriptomic levels, and provide a foundational knowledge of the T. pallidum protein expression repertoire. Here we describe the optimization of a T. pallidum-specific sample preparation workflow and mass spectrometry-based proteomics pipeline which allowed for the detection of 77% of the T. pallidum protein repertoire under infection conditions. When combined with prior studies, this brings the overall coverage of the T. pallidum proteome to almost 90%. These investigations identified 27 known/predicted OMPs, including potential vaccine candidates, and detected expression of 11 potential OMPs under infection conditions for the first time. The optimized pipeline provides a robust and reproducible workflow for investigating T. pallidum protein expression during infection. Importantly, the combined results provide the deepest coverage of the T. pallidum proteome to date.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.