Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37880657›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Occupational protection behavior and its influencing factors of newly recruited nurses.

Yang Xu, Wen-Jie Liu, Xia Wang, Qian-Mei Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yang XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.
Wen-Jie LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.
Xia WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.
Qian-Mei YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China. 835263964@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimAim The objective of this study was to understand the occupational protective behaviors of newly recruited nurses and explore the influencing factors.

methodsA convenience sampling method was used to select newly recruited nurses in our hospital from July 2018 to November 2019. The survey was conducted using the general information questionnaire, work attitude scale (Wa), and occupational protective behavior scale.

resultsThe total score of occupational protective behaviors of 150 newly enrolled nurses was 18.94 ± 3.59. There was a significant negative correlation between work attitude score and occupational protective behaviors (r = -0.324, p < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that gender, previous participation in nursing skill-based competitions, experience of needlestick injuries before recruit, work attitude score, average daily sleep time (p < 0.05) were independent factors influencing occupational protective behaviors.

conclusionsThe overall occupational protective awareness of newly enrolled nurses is relatively weak and needs to be further improved. The group's ability to improve occupational protective behaviors may be positively impacted through increased adaptability, improved sleep, active participation in nursing skill-based competitions, strengthening guidance and education on occupational protection.

Indexed as

Needlestick InjuriesNursesAttitude of Health PersonnelHospitalsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesInfluencing factorsNeedlestick and sharps injuriesNew recruitsNurseOccupational protective behaviorWork attitude

Identifiers

PMID37880657
PMCPMC10601324

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.