Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37889644›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

The Importance of Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Mammary Tumors in Bitches.

Marcus Antônio Rossi Feliciano, Brenda Dos Santos Pompeu de Miranda, Luiz Paulo Nogueira Aires, Bruna Bressianini Lima, Ana Paula Luiz de Oliveira, Giovanna Serpa Maciel Feliciano, Ricardo Andrés Ramirez Uscategui

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Synchronous Multiple Primary Tumors in a Dog: A Case Report.Case reports in veterinary medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Diagnostic Imaging Features of Mammary Gland Tumors in Dogs and Cats.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcus Antônio Rossi FelicianoLaboratory of Veterinary Imaginology, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering (FZEA), Sao Paulo University (USP), Pirassununga 13635-900, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Brenda Dos Santos Pompeu de MirandaDepartment of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Sao Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (FCAV/UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Paulo Nogueira AiresDepartment of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Sao Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (FCAV/UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Bruna Bressianini LimaDepartment of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Sao Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (FCAV/UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Paula Luiz de OliveiraDepartment of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Sao Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (FCAV/UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2684-2778
Giovanna Serpa Maciel FelicianoLaboratory of Veterinary Imaginology, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering (FZEA), Sao Paulo University (USP), Pirassununga 13635-900, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3628-2989
Ricardo Andrés Ramirez UscateguiResearch Group INCA-CES, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Universidad CES, Medellín 050021, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-9760-8631
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRClínica CES · CO

Funding

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 305182/2020-0São Paulo Research Foundation 2012/16635-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high incidence of mammary tumors in small animals is concerning. Patient history, clinical examination, physical evaluation, and imaging studies are important for clinical staging. Ultrasonography is commonly applied to investigate the presence of abdominal metastasis. However, it has been shown to provide important information regarding mammary tumors' architecture and advanced sonographic techniques can provide information regarding neovascularization, stiffness, and perfusion. Different techniques have been investigated to determine accuracy to predict the lesions' histological classification. This paper reviews the information regarding each sonographic technique in the evaluation of mammary tumors, describing the most common findings and their potential to accurately assess and predict malignancy. Even though the gold standard for the diagnosis of mammary lesions is the histopathological examination, some ultrasonographic features described can predict the potential of a lesion being malignant. Among the different sonographic techniques, elastography can be considered the most reliable modality to accurately differentiate benign from malignant tumors when malignant lesions present increased stiffness. However, the combination of all sonographic techniques can provide important information that can lead to a better therapeutic approach and clinical staging. Furthermore, the potential of the sonographic study, especially CEUS to monitor therapeutic progression, demonstrate the need of further studies.

Indexed as

angiogenesiscaninediagnostic imagingelasticity imaging techniquesneoplasmsperfusion

Identifiers

PMID37889644
PMCPMC10252055
OpenAlexW4378176445

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.