ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2023
Glycemic control, HbA1c variability, and major cardiovascular adverse outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients with elevated cardiovascular risk: insights from the ACCORD study.
Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between glycated hemoglobin variability and risk of diabetic kidney disease and diabetic retinopathy in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of prusogliptin in type-2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Irish journal of medical science · 2025Pooled it
- The effect of HbA1c variability on the efficacy of intensive blood pressure control in patients with type 2 diabetes.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Trial
- Increased Risk of Infections in People Living With Diabetes.Diabetes · 2026Review
- [Buffering effect of intensive lipid lowering on mortality risk in type 2 diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease and challenging glycemic management: a cohort study based on dual metabolic trajectories].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026Article
- Additive Effects of Quercetin-RichPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Associations of the hs-CRP/HDL-C ratio with cardiovascular metabolic multimorbidity: a large cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Implications of Genetic Elements on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Pathogenesis and Management.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2026Review
- The comparative efficacy of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists on metabolic benefits in T2DM patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Diabetes and its complications: molecular mechanisms, prevention and treatment.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- [Glycemic control, psychosocial factors, and quality of life among people with diabetes in primary health care settingsControl de la glucemia, factores psicosociales y calidad de vida en personas con diabetes en entornos de atención primaria de salud].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2026Article
- Association Between Insulin Regimen and Cardiovascular Risk in Indonesian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2026Article
- Immune Checkpoint Restoration as a Therapeutic Strategy to Halt Diabetes-Driven Atherosclerosis.Biology · 2025Review
- A glucose time in range of 70% attenuates the senescence-inducing and pro-inflammatory effects of hyperglycemia.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Article
- Latent class growth mixture modeling of HbA1C trajectories identifies individuals at high risk of developing complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UK Biobank.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2025Article
- The effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on HbA1c variability and cardiovascular and renal adverse outcome in patients with T2DM.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
- Review
- Association of hemoglobin glycation index with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with diabetes or prediabetes and comorbid cardiovascular disease: a population-based cohort study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Adherence to life's essential 8 and progression trajectory of cardiometabolic multimorbidity: a prospective cohort study.Nutrition & metabolism · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough recent guidelines advocate for HbA1c target individualization, a comprehensive criterion for patient categorization remains absent. This study aimed to categorize HbA1c variability levels and explore the relationship between glycemic control, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality across different degrees of variability.
methodsAction to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes study data were used. HbA1c variability was measured using the HbA1c variability score (HVS) and standard deviation (SD). K-means and K-medians clustering were used to combine the HVS and SD.
resultsK-means clustering was the most stable algorithm with the lowest clustering similarities. In the low variability group, intensive glucose-lowering treatment significantly reduced the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes (HR: 0·78 [95% CI: 0·63, 0·97]) without increasing mortality risk (HR: 1·07 [0.81, 1·42]); the risk of adverse cardiovascular events (HR: 1·33 [1·14, 1·56]) and all-cause mortality (HR: 1·23 [1·01,1·51]) increased with increasing mean HbA1c. In the high variability group, treatment increased the risk of cardiovascular events (HR: 2.00 [1·54, 2·60]) and mortality (HR: 2·20 [1·66, 2·92]); a higher mean HbA1c (7·86%, [7·66%, 8·06%]) had the lowest mortality risk, when the mean HbA1c was < 7·86%, a higher mean HbA1c was associated with a lower mortality risk (HR: 0·63 [0·42, 0·95]). In the medium variability group, a mean HbA1c around 7·5% was associated with the lowest risk.
conclusionsHbA1c variability can guide glycemic control targets for patients with type 2 diabetes. For patients with low variability, the lower the HbA1c, the lower the risk. For those with medium variability, controlling HbA1c at 7·5% provides the maximum benefit. For patients with high variability, a mean HbA1c of around 7·8% presents the lowest risk of all-cause mortality, a lower HbA1c did not provide cardiovascular benefits but instead increased the mortality risk. Further studies, especially those with patients that reflect the general population with type 2 diabetes undergoing the latest therapeutic approaches, are essential to validate the conclusions of this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.