Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37894167›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2023

The Future Is Now: Unraveling the Expanding Potential of Human (Necro)Microbiome in Forensic Investigations.

Ana Cláudia-Ferreira, Daniel José Barbosa, Veroniek Saegeman, Amparo Fernández-Rodríguez, Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira, Ana R Freitas, On Behalf Of The Escmid Study Group Of Forensic And Post-Mortem Microbiology Esgfor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. RedefiningFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana Cláudia-Ferreira1H-TOXRUN, One Health Toxicology Research Unit, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS), CESPU, CRL, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal.
Daniel José Barbosa1H-TOXRUN, One Health Toxicology Research Unit, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS), CESPU, CRL, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1726-6011
Veroniek SaegemanDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0439-0205
Amparo Fernández-RodríguezMicrobiology Laboratory, Biology Service, Institute of Toxicology and Forensic Sciences, 28232 Madrid, Spain.
Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira1H-TOXRUN, One Health Toxicology Research Unit, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS), CESPU, CRL, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7430-6297
Ana R Freitas1H-TOXRUN, One Health Toxicology Research Unit, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS), CESPU, CRL, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7326-4133
On Behalf Of The Escmid Study Group Of Forensic And Post-Mortem Microbiology Esgfor

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relevance of

Indexed as

bacteriadecompositionmicrobiomenecrobiomepostmortemthanatomicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID37894167
PMCPMC10608847

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.