ArticlePharmaceutics2023
PRID: Prediction Model Using RWR for Interactions between Drugs.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational approaches for drug-drug interaction prediction: a systematic review of data sources, modeling strategies, and evaluation frameworks.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- LLM-Enhanced Multimodal Framework for Drug-Drug Interaction Prediction.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based drug-drug interaction prediction: a critical review of models, limitations, and data challenges.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- MIMR: Development of a Web-Based System for miRNA and mRNA Integrated Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- MMFSyn: A Multimodal Deep Learning Model for Predicting Anticancer Synergistic Drug Combination Effect.Biomolecules · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Drug-drug interactions (DDI) occur because of the unexpected pharmacological effects of drug pairs. Although drug efficacy can be improved by taking two or more drugs in the short term, this may cause inevitable side effects. Currently, multiple drugs are prescribed based on the experience or knowledge of the clinician, and there is no standard database that can be referred to as safe co-prescriptions. Thus, accurately identifying DDI is critical for patient safety and treatment modalities. Many computational methods have been developed to predict DDIs based on chemical structures or biological features, such as target genes or functional mechanisms. However, some features are only available for certain drugs, and their pathological mechanisms cannot be fully employed to predict DDIs by considering the direct overlap of target genes. In this study, we propose a novel deep learning model to predict DDIs by utilizing chemical structure similarity and protein-protein interaction (PPI) information among drug-binding proteins, such as carriers, transporters, enzymes, and targets (CTET) proteins. We applied the random walk with restart (RWR) algorithm to propagate drug CTET proteins across a PPI network derived from the STRING database, which will lead to the successful incorporation of the hidden biological mechanisms between CTET proteins and disease-associated genes. We confirmed that the RWR propagation of CTET proteins helps predict DDIs by utilizing indirectly co-regulated biological mechanisms. Our method identified the known DDIs between clinically proven epilepsy drugs. Our results demonstrated the effectiveness of PRID in predicting DDIs in known drug combinations as well as unknown drug pairs. PRID could be helpful in identifying novel DDIs and associated pharmacological mechanisms to cause the DDIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.