ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Depressive Disorder Recognition Based on Frontal EEG Signals and Deep Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognition-Modulated EEG Signatures and Clinical Features in Major Depressive Disorder: A Machine Learning-Based Exploratory Study.Alpha psychiatry · 2026Article
- The relationships between diabetic male infertility, diabetic cognitive impairment, and the neuroendocrine-immune network: A review.Medicine · 2026Review
- Depression Detection from Three-Channel Resting-State EEG Using a Hybrid Conv1D and Spectral-Statistical Fusion Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation Approach for Diagnosis of Drug-Naïve Men With Major Depressive Disorder Using Resting-State Electroencephalography.Depression and anxiety · 2025Article
- Psychiatric disorders from EEG signals through deep learning models.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2024Article
- Resting-State Electroencephalogram Depression Diagnosis Based on Traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Comparative Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Enhanced diagnostics for generalized anxiety disorder: leveraging differential channel and functional connectivity features based on frontal EEG signals.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A machine learning based depression screening framework using temporal domain features of the electroencephalography signals.PloS one · 2024Article
- The application of artificial intelligence in insomnia, anxiety, and depression: A bibliometric analysis.Digital healthArticle
- Machine Learning-Based Depression Recognition With Preserved Efficacy From Compressed EEG Signals Using Wavelet Transform and Adaptive Filtering.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Depressive disorder (DD) has become one of the most common mental diseases, seriously endangering both the affected person's psychological and physical health. Nowadays, a DD diagnosis mainly relies on the experience of clinical psychiatrists and subjective scales, lacking objective, accurate, practical, and automatic diagnosis technologies. Recently, electroencephalogram (EEG) signals have been widely applied for DD diagnosis, but mainly with high-density EEG, which can severely limit the efficiency of the EEG data acquisition and reduce the practicability of diagnostic techniques. The current study attempts to achieve accurate and practical DD diagnoses based on combining frontal six-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) signals and deep learning models. To this end, 10 min clinical resting-state EEG signals were collected from 41 DD patients and 34 healthy controls (HCs). Two deep learning models, multi-resolution convolutional neural network (MRCNN) combined with long short-term memory (LSTM) (named MRCNN-LSTM) and MRCNN combined with residual squeeze and excitation (RSE) (named MRCNN-RSE), were proposed for DD recognition. The results of this study showed that the higher EEG frequency band obtained the better classification performance for DD diagnosis. The MRCNN-RSE model achieved the highest classification accuracy of 98.48 ± 0.22% with 8-30 Hz EEG signals. These findings indicated that the proposed analytical framework can provide an accurate and practical strategy for DD diagnosis, as well as essential theoretical and technical support for the treatment and efficacy evaluation of DD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.