Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37900032›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Seroprevalence, infection, and personal protective equipment use among Colombian healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Edgar O Beltrán, Stefania Martignon, Carolina Coronel-Ruiz, Myriam L Velandia-Romero, Consuelo Romero-Sanchez, Viviana Avila, Jaime E Castellanos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Edgar O BeltránUniversidad El Bosque, Research Department, UNICA-Caries Research Unit, Bogotá, Colombia.
Stefania MartignonUniversidad El Bosque, Research Department, UNICA-Caries Research Unit, Bogotá, Colombia.
Carolina Coronel-RuizUniversidad El Bosque, Vicerrectoría de Investigaciones, Grupo de Virología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Myriam L Velandia-RomeroUniversidad El Bosque, Vicerrectoría de Investigaciones, Grupo de Virología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Consuelo Romero-SanchezUniversidad El Bosque, Cellular and Molecular Immunology Group, InmuBO, School of Dentistry, Bogotá, Colombia.
Viviana AvilaUniversidad El Bosque, Research Department, UNICA-Caries Research Unit, Bogotá, Colombia.
Jaime E CastellanosUniversidad El Bosque, Vicerrectoría de Investigaciones, Grupo de Virología, Bogotá, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at the forefront of the COVID-19 response and frequently come into close contact with patients and their virus-contaminated body fluids. Recent studies have identified differential risks of infection and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) among HCWs. However, available data might be interpreted with caution because of differences in the national health systems, local implementation issues, and adherence limitations to guidelines. A comprehensive description of infection, exposure at work, and biosafety habits during the COVID-19 pandemic has not been conducted among the HCW groups in Latin American populations. Objective: To describe SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence, infections, and extent of PPE use during the COVID-19 pandemic among HCWs at three different times, including dental practitioners (DP), nursing assistants (NA), physicians (P), and respiratory therapists (RT), from Bogotá, Colombia. Methods: After IRB approval, this cross-sectional study included 307 HCWs. Participants provided nasopharyngeal swabs and blood samples to detect viral RNA (RT-qPCR) and IgM/IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 (ELFA-ELISA) at baseline (BL) and two follow-ups. Infection prevalence was defined as the number of positive-tested participants (RT-qPCR and/or IgM). Data on clinical status and biosafety habits were collected each time. Results: Differential infection prevalence was found among HCWs through the study timeline (BL: RT-qPCR = 2.6%, IgM = 1.6%; follow-up 1 (45 days after BL): RT-qPCR = 4.5%, IgM = 3.9%; follow-up 2 (60 days after BL): RT-qPCR = 3.58%, IgM = 1.3%. Dental practitioners showed a higher infection frequency in BL and follow-up 1. IgG-positive tested HCWs percentage progressively increased from BL to follow-ups among the whole sample while index values decreased. Limitations in N95 availability and a high perception of occupational risk were reported. Conclusion: A low prevalence of active SARS-CoV-2 infections among HCWs groups was found. Over time, there was an increase in participants showing IgG antibodies, although the levels of these antibodies in the blood decreased. Additionally, HCWs reported limitations in the availability of PPE as well as a variation in their safety practices.

Indexed as

COVID-19ColombiaCross-Sectional StudiesDentistsHealth PersonnelHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MPandemicsPersonal Protective EquipmentProfessional RoleSARS-CoV-2Seroepidemiologic StudiesImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MbiosafetyCOVID-19health personnelinfectionprevalenceSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37900032
PMCPMC10602893

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.