ArticleHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2024
Preeclampsia Prediction Using Machine Learning and Polygenic Risk Scores From Clinical and Genetic Risk Factors in Early and Late Pregnancies.
Article in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning Prediction Models for Preeclampsia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence and predictive analytics in obstetric anesthesia: early warning for maternal complications.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2026Review
- Eclampsia risk prediction across diverse U.S. populations using CDC data: machine learning versus ACOG checklists.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for Dynamic and Short-Term Prediction of Preeclampsia Using Routine Clinical Data.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Development of a Triage Tool for Stratification and Referral of Women at Risk of Preeclampsia in Low-Resource Antenatal Settings: A Prospective Cohort Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Construction and comparison of preeclampsia prediction models using logistic regression and machine learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- A novel approach to preeclampsia early prediction addressing predictive uncertainty due to missing data in clinical dataset.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Advances in Women's Health Diagnostics: Current Applications and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Genetic factors in the risk assessment of preeclampsia: a review of recent findings.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Expanding the scope of non-invasive prenatal screening.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- Controversy in Hypertension: Pro-Side of the Argument Using Artificial Intelligence for Hypertension Diagnosis and Management.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2025Review
- Improved Prediction Accuracy for Late-Onset Preeclampsia Using cfRNA Profiles: A Comparative Study of Marker Selection Strategies.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prediction of high-risk pregnancy based on machine learning algorithms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Preeclampsia prediction with maternal and paternal polygenic risk scores: the TMM BirThree Cohort Study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Leveraging Machine Learning to Predict and Assess Disparities in Severe Maternal Morbidity in Maryland.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Analysis of serological risk factors for preeclampsia and the predictive role of high homocysteine levels.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable longitudinal preeclampsia risk prediction using machine learning.PloS one · 2025Article
- Preeclampsia prediction and diagnosis: a comprehensive historical review from clinical insights to omics perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Prospective Applications of Artificial Intelligence In Fetal Medicine: A Scoping Review of Recent Updates.International journal of general medicine · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreeclampsia, a pregnancy-specific condition associated with new-onset hypertension after 20-weeks gestation, is a leading cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Predictive tools to understand which individuals are most at risk are needed.
methodsWe identified a cohort of N=1125 pregnant individuals who delivered between May 2015 and May 2022 at Mass General Brigham Hospitals with available electronic health record data and linked genetic data. Using clinical electronic health record data and systolic blood pressure polygenic risk scores derived from a large genome-wide association study, we developed machine learning (XGBoost) and logistic regression models to predict preeclampsia risk.
resultsPregnant individuals with a systolic blood pressure polygenic risk score in the top quartile had higher blood pressures throughout pregnancy compared with patients within the lowest quartile systolic blood pressure polygenic risk score. In the first trimester, the most predictive model was XGBoost, with an area under the curve of 0.74. In late pregnancy, with data obtained up to the delivery admission, the best-performing model was XGBoost using clinical variables, which achieved an area under the curve of 0.91. Adding the systolic blood pressure polygenic risk score to the models did not improve the performance significantly based on De Long test comparing the area under the curve of models with and without the polygenic score.
conclusionsIntegrating clinical factors into predictive models can inform personalized preeclampsia risk and achieve higher predictive power than the current practice. In the future, personalized tools can be implemented to identify high-risk patients for preventative therapies and timely intervention to improve adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.