ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2024
Characterization of pulmonary arterial stiffness using cardiac MRI.
Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ventricular Strain Predicts the Risk of Right Heart Failure After Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Relationship of cardiac MRI-derived pulmonary arterial stiffness markers and invasive hemodynamic.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- The NOTCH3 extracellular domain is a serum biomarker for pulmonary arterial hypertension.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Pulmonary Artery Remodelling Assessed by Four-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Atrial Septal Defect.CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary arterial stiffness (PAS) is a pathologic hallmark of all types of pulmonary hypertension (PH). Cardiac MRI (CMR), a gold-standard imaging modality for the evaluation of pulmonary flow, biventricular morphology and function has been historically reserved for the longitudinal clinical follow-up, PH phenotyping purposes, right ventricular evaluation, and research purposes. Over the last two decades, numerous indices combining invasive catheterization and non-invasive CMR have been utilized to phenotype the character and severity of PAS in different types of PH and to assess its clinically prognostic potential with encouraging results. Many recent studies have demonstrated a strong role of CMR derived PAS markers in predicting long-term clinical outcomes and improving currently gold standard risk assessment provided by the REVEAL calculator. With the utilization of a machine learning strategies, strong diagnostic and prognostic performance of CMR reported in multicenter studies, and ability to detect PH at early stages, the non-invasive assessment of PAS is on verge of routine clinical utilization. In this review, we focus on appraising important CMR studies interrogating PAS over the last 20 years, describing the benefits and limitations of different PAS indices, and their pathophysiologic relevance to pulmonary vascular remodeling. We also discuss the role of CMR and PAS in clinical surveillance and phenotyping of PH, and the long-term future goal to utilize PAS as a biomarker to aid with more targeted therapeutic management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.