ArticleApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2024
Identifying a Risk Signature of Methylation-Driven Genes as a Predictor of Survival Outcome for Colon Cancer Patients.
Article in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The molecular mechanism of IGF2BP3 promoting the malignant progression of lung cancer.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- DNA methylation analysis with nasal brushing for early diagnosis of sinonasal malignant tumours.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- The prognostic significance of epoxide hydrolases in colorectal cancer.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aberrant expression of gene is driven by its promoter methylation and is the key molecular basis of carcinogenic processes. This study aimed at identifying a risk signature of methylation-driven (MD) genes and evaluating its prognostic value for colon cancer (CC) patients. The expression profiles of methylation and mRNA in CC samples were obtained from the TCGA database, and the MethylMix algorithm was used to identify MD genes. The relationships between their expression levels and overall survival (OS) of CC patients were analyzed, and a prognostic signature of MD genes was established. The risk score of gene signature was calculated, and the median was used to divide all patients into high (H) and low (L) risk groups. The prognostic value of gene signature was tested by the TCGA cohort and an independent validation cohort (GSE17538 dataset). In total, 69 MD genes were identified, and 7 were associated with OS of CC patients. Ultimately, 4 (TWIST1, LDOC1, EPHX3, and STC2) were screened out to establish a risk signature. The H-risk patients (>0.923) had a worse OS than L-risk patients (≤0.923) in both the TCGA (5-year cumulative survival: 52.9% vs 72.0%, P=0.005) and GSE17538 cohort (49.4% vs 69.3%, P=0.004). The AUC values of MD genes signature for the prediction of 3- and 5-year OS were 0.648 and 0.643 in the TCGA dataset and 0.634 and 0.624 in the GSE17538 dataset, respectively. The risk signature of four MD genes was identified as an independent predictor of OS for CC patients (HR for TCGA dataset: 2.071, 95% CI=1.196-3.586, P=0.009; HR for GSE17538 dataset: 2.021, 95% CI=1.290-3.166, P=0.002). The risk signature of four MD genes might be a useful prognostic tool and help doctors improve the clinical management of CC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.