Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37907989›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2023

Human cytomegalovirus seropositivity is associated with reduced patient survival during sepsis.

M Unterberg, S F Ehrentraut, T Bracht, A Wolf, H Haberl, A von Busch, K Rump, D Ziehe, M Bazzi, P Thon and 26 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Plasma proteomics identifies molecular subtypes in sepsis.Critical care (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Impact of Pathogens on Sepsis Prevalence and Outcome.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

M Unterberg *Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
S F Ehrentraut *Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
T BrachtKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
A WolfKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
H HaberlKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
A von BuschKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
K RumpKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
D ZieheKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
M BazziKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
P ThonKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
B SitekKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
K MarcusMedizinisches Proteom-Center, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801, Bochum, Germany.
M BayerKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
K SchorkMedizinisches Proteom-Center, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801, Bochum, Germany.
M EisenacherMedizinisches Proteom-Center, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801, Bochum, Germany.
B EllgerKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Westfalen, Dortmund, Germany.
D OswaldKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Westfalen, Dortmund, Germany.
F WapplerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne Merheim Medical School, Cologne, Germany.
J DefosseDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne Merheim Medical School, Cologne, Germany.
D HenzlerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, Klinikum Herford, Herford, Germany.
T KöhlerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, Klinikum Herford, Herford, Germany.
A ZarbockKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Operative Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany.
C P PutensenKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
J C ScheweKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
U H FreyMarien Hospital Herne, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
M AnftCenter for Translational Medicine, Medical Clinic I, Marien Hospital Herne, University Hospital of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany.
N BabelCenter for Translational Medicine, Medical Clinic I, Marien Hospital Herne, University Hospital of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany.
E SteinmannDepartment of Molecular and Medical Virology, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801, Bochum, Germany.
Y BrüggemannDepartment of Molecular and Medical Virology, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801, Bochum, Germany.
M TrillingInstitute for Virology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
A SchlüterKnappschaft Kliniken GmbH, Recklinghausen, Germany.
H NowakKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
M AdamzikKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
T Rahmel *Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
B Koos *Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany. Bjoern.Koos@rub.de.
SepsisDataNet.NRW research group
Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum · DERuhr University Bochum · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEUniversitätsklinik Marien Hospital Herne · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DEHerford Hospital · DEKlinikum Ingolstadt · DEKnappschaftskrankenhaus Recklinghausen · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

European Regional Development Fund of the European Union SepsisDataNet
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is one of the leading causes of death. Treatment attempts targeting the immune response regularly fail in clinical trials. As HCMV latency can modulate the immune response and changes the immune cell composition, we hypothesized that HCMV serostatus affects mortality in sepsis patients.

methodsWe determined the HCMV serostatus (i.e., latency) of 410 prospectively enrolled patients of the multicenter SepsisDataNet.NRW study. Patients were recruited according to the SEPSIS-3 criteria and clinical data were recorded in an observational approach. We quantified 13 cytokines at Days 1, 4, and 8 after enrollment. Proteomics data were analyzed from the plasma samples of 171 patients.

resultsThe 30-day mortality was higher in HCMV-seropositive patients than in seronegative sepsis patients (38% vs. 25%, respectively; p = 0.008; HR, 1.656; 95% CI 1.135-2.417). This effect was observed independent of age (p = 0.010; HR, 1.673; 95% CI 1.131-2.477). The predictive value on the outcome of the increased concentrations of IL-6 was present only in the seropositive cohort (30-day mortality, 63% vs. 24%; HR 3.250; 95% CI 2.075-5.090; p < 0.001) with no significant differences in serum concentrations of IL-6 between the two groups. Procalcitonin and IL-10 exhibited the same behavior and were predictive of the outcome only in HCMV-seropositive patients.

conclusionWe suggest that the predictive value of inflammation-associated biomarkers should be re-evaluated with regard to the HCMV serostatus. Targeting HCMV latency might open a new approach to selecting suitable patients for individualized treatment in sepsis.

Indexed as

Cytomegalovirus InfectionsSepsisCytomegalovirusHumansImmunityInterleukin-6Interleukin-6HCMV latencyInflammatory biomarkerMortality predictionSepsis

Identifiers

PMID37907989
PMCPMC10619294
OpenAlexW4388089356

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.