ArticleApplied spectroscopy2024
Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy-Based Detection of Micro-RNA Biomarkers for Biomedical Diagnosis Using a Comparative Study of Interpretable Machine Learning Algorithms.
Article in Applied spectroscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determining mosquito age using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and artificial neural networks: insights into the influence of origin and sex.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- AI in SERS sensing moving from discriminative to generative.Npj biosensing · 2025Review
- Nanoplasmonics biosensors: At the frontiers of biomedical diagnostics.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) has wide diagnostic applications due to narrow spectral features that allow multiplex analysis. We have previously developed a multiplexed, SERS-based nanosensor for micro-RNA (miRNA) detection called the inverse molecular sentinel (iMS). Machine learning (ML) algorithms have been increasingly adopted for spectral analysis due to their ability to discover underlying patterns and relationships within large and complex data sets. However, the high dimensionality of SERS data poses a challenge for traditional ML techniques, which can be prone to overfitting and poor generalization. Non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) reduces the dimensionality of SERS data while preserving information content. In this paper, we compared the performance of ML methods including convolutional neural network (CNN), support vector regression, and extreme gradient boosting combined with and without NMF for spectral unmixing of four-way multiplexed SERS spectra from iMS assays used for miRNA detection. CNN achieved high accuracy in spectral unmixing. Incorporating NMF before CNN drastically decreased memory and training demands without sacrificing model performance on SERS spectral unmixing. Additionally, models were interpreted using gradient class activation maps and partial dependency plots to understand predictions. These models were used to analyze clinical SERS data from single-plexed iMS in RNA extracted from 17 endoscopic tissue biopsies. CNN and CNN-NMF, trained on multiplexed data, performed most accurately with RMSE
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.