Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37910469›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Alcohol use among emergency medicine department patients in Tanzania: A comparative analysis of injury versus non-injury patients.

Alena Pauley, Emily C Thatcher, Joshua T Sarafian, Siddhesh Zadey, Frida Shayo, Blandina T Mmbaga, Francis Sakita, Judith Boshe, João Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci, Catherine A Staton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. "medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. "medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alena PauleyDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7489-7469
Emily C ThatcherDuke Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Joshua T SarafianDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8882-8026
Siddhesh ZadeyDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Frida ShayoKilimanjaro Christian Medical Center, Moshi, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0779-8209
Blandina T MmbagaKilimanjaro Christian Medical Center, Moshi, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5550-1916
Francis SakitaKilimanjaro Christian Medical Center, Moshi, Tanzania.
Judith BosheKilimanjaro Christian Medical Center, Moshi, Tanzania.
João Ricardo Nickenig VissociDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Catherine A StatonDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6468-2894
Duke University · USKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre · TZDuke Medical Center · US

Funding

PRACT: A Pragmatic Randomized Adaptive Clinical Trial to Investigate Controlling Alcohol related harms in a Low-Income Setting; Emergency Department Brief Interventions in TanzaniaR01AA027512 · NIAAA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI STATON, CATHERINE ANN · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA027512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlcohol is a leading behavioral risk factor for death and disability worldwide. Tanzania has few trained personnel and resources for treating unhealthy alcohol use. In Emergency Medicine Departments (EMDs), alcohol is a well-known risk factor for injury patients. At Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center (KCMC) in Moshi, Tanzania, 30% of EMD injury patients (IP) test positive for alcohol upon arrival to the ED. While the IP population is prime for EMD-based interventions, there is limited data on if non-injury patients (NIP) have similar alcohol use behavior and potentially benefit from screening and intervention as well.

methodsThis was a secondary analysis of a systematic random sampling of adult (≥18 years old), KiSwahili speaking, KCMC EMD patients surveyed between October 2021 and May 2022. When medically stable and clinically sober, participants provided informed consent. Information on demographics (sex, age, years of education, type of employment, income, marital status, tribe, and religion), injury status, self-reported alcohol use, and Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) Identification Test (AUDIT) scores were collected. Descriptive statistics were analyzed in RStudio using frequencies and proportions.

resultsOf the 376 patients enrolled, 59 (15.7%) presented with an injury. The IP and NIP groups did not differ in any demographics except sex, an expected difference as females were intentionally oversampled in the original study design. The mean [SD] AUDIT score (IP: 5.8 [6.6]; NIP: 3.9 [6.1]), drinks per week, and proportion of AUDIT ≥8 was higher for IP (IP:37%; NIP: 21%). However, alcohol preferences, drinking quantity, weekly expenditure on alcohol, perceptions of unhealthy alcohol use, attempts and reasons to quit, and treatment seeking were comparable between IPs and NIPs.

conclusionOur data suggests 37% of injury and 20% of non-injury patients screen positive for harmful or hazardous drinking in our setting. An EMD-based alcohol treatment and referral process could be beneficial to reduce this growing behavioral risk factor in non-injury as well as injury populations.

Identifiers

PMID37910469
PMCPMC10619788
OpenAlexW4388142188

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.